Reduction of CT Artifacts Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), Polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), and Polyethylene (PE) Reconstruction Plates in Oral Oncology.

Purpose: Surgical reconstruction after segmental mandibulectomy in patients with oral cancer commonly requires implantation of titanium plates, which cause metallic artifacts in CT examinations detrimental for image quality. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate CT artifacts and image quality of the polymer plate materials polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), and polyethylene (PE) in mandible reconstruction.
Methods: Five plates (titanium, PEEK, PEKK, PPSU, and PE) were successively surgically inserted in a human cadaveric specimen using eight (1) titanium and (2) zirconium oxide screws. Streak and blooming artifacts were assessed in 1 mm CT scans with and without metallic artifact reduction algorithms (MAR) in this cross-sectional study. The different plate materials were analyzed for their effect on Hounsfield unit (HU) values resulting in streak artifacts. Blooming artifacts were measured as virtual growth of plates compared to actual size. Subjective image quality was assessed by 3 independent observers. Statistics were conducted by multifactorial ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc test.
Results: Titanium (182.42 HU; SD ± 3.09) was associated with significantly more streak and blooming artifacts compared to the polymers PEEK (86.41 HU; SD ± 1.72; P < .001), PEKK (85.50 HU; SD ± 2.75; P < .001), PPSU (85.51 HU; SD ± 1.97; P < .001), and PE (85.52 HU; SD ± 3.33; P < .001) implants. No significant differences could be seen between the screw types (titanium vs zirconium oxide) (P = .75) or the activation or inactivation of MAR (P = .85). Image quality was best for PE and worst for titanium implants in combination with zirconium oxide screws.
Conclusions: Polymers plate materials PEEK, PEKK, PPSU, and PE significantly reduce CT artifacts and improve image quality facilitating the radiological interpretation of implant surrounding tissues. This effect is beneficial for radiological tumor follow-up and CT-based planning of adjuvant radiotherapy.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)