Back to Search Start Over

The Effectiveness of Depression Treatment for Adults with ESKD: A Systematic Review.

Authors :
Chopra P
Ayers CK
Antick JR
Kansagara D
Kondo K
Source :
Kidney360 [Kidney360] 2021 Jan 07; Vol. 2 (3), pp. 558-585. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 07 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Adults with dialysis-dependent ESKD experience higher rates of depression than the general population, yet efficacy of depression treatments in this population is not well understood. We conducted a systematic review of the benefits and harms of depression treatment in adults with ESKD. We searched multiple data sources through June 2020 for English-language, controlled trials that compared interventions for depression in adults with ESKD to another intervention, placebo, or usual care, and reported depression treatment-related outcomes. Observational studies were included for harms. Two investigators independently screened all studies using prespecified criteria. One reviewer abstracted data on study design, interventions, implementation characteristics, and outcomes, and a second reviewer provided confirmation. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and resolved any discords through discussion or a third reviewer. Strength of evidence (SOE) was assessed and agreed upon by review-team consensus. We qualitatively analyzed the data and present syntheses in text and tables. We included 26 RCTs and three observational studies. SSRIs were the most studied type of drug and the evidence was largely insufficient. We found moderate SOE that long-term, high-dose vitamin D3 is ineffective for reducing depression severity. Cognitive behavioral therapy is more effective than (undefined) psychotherapy and placebo for depression improvement and quality of life (low SOE), and acupressure is more effective than usual care or sham acupressure in reducing depression severity (low SOE). There is limited research evaluating treatment for depression in adults with ESKD, and existing studies may not be generalizable to adults in the United States. Studies suffer from limitations related to methodologic quality or reporting. More research replicating studies of promising interventions in US populations, with larger samples, is needed. Systematic Review registry name and registration number : PROSPERO, CRD42020140227.<br />Competing Interests: All authors have nothing to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2641-7650
Volume :
2
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Kidney360
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35369008
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0003142020