Novel predictive role for mid-regional proadrenomedullin in moderate to severe aortic stenosis.

Objective: We investigated the prognostic significance of selected known and novel circulating biomarkers in aortic stenosis (AS).
Methods: N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin-T (hsTnT), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2), mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and mid-regional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) were measured in patients with moderate to severe AS, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, recruited consecutively across five centres from 2011 to 2018. Their ability to predict both primary (all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation or progression to NYHA class III-IV) and secondary (additionally incorporating syncope and acute coronary syndrome) outcomes was determined by competing risk analyses.
Results: Among 173 patients with AS (age 69±11 years, 55% male, peak transaortic velocity (Vmax) 4.0±0.8 m/s), the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 59 (34%) and 66 (38%), respectively. With aortic valve replacement as a competing risk, the primary outcome was determined consistently by the comorbidity index and each selected biomarker except ST2 (p<0.05), independent of NYHA class, Vmax, LV-global longitudinal strain and serum creatinine. MR-proADM had the highest discriminative value for both primary (subdistribution HR (SHR) 11.3, 95% CI 3.9 to 32.7) and secondary outcomes (SHR 12.6, 95% CI 4.7 to 33.5). Prognostic assessment of dual-biomarker combinations identified MR-proADM plus either hsTnT or NT-proBNP as the best predictive model for both clinical outcomes. Paired biomarker models were not superior to those including MR-proADM as the sole circulating biomarker.
Conclusion: MR-proADM most powerfully portended worse prognosis and should be further assessed as possibly the biomarker of choice for risk stratification in AS.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: SHE reports personal fees from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Medical, outside the submitted work. ZPD reports personal/speaker fees from GE and Phillips, and non-financial support from Phillips, outside the submitted work. AMR reports grants from National Medical Research Council of Singapore during the conduct of the study, is a long-term collaborator with Roche Diagnostics, the provider of assays central to this submission, and received support in kind, grants, speaker’s honoraria and acted on advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics. LHHL reports grants from National Medical Research Council of Singapore during the conduct of the study.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)