Back to Search Start Over

Consideration of Fractional Distribution Parameter f d in the Chen and Gross Method for Tissue-to-Plasma Partition Coefficients: Comparison of Several Methods.

Authors :
Jeong YS
Jusko WJ
Source :
Pharmaceutical research [Pharm Res] 2022 Mar; Vol. 39 (3), pp. 463-479. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 14.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: The tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient (K <subscript>p</subscript> ) describes the extent of tissue distribution in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. Constant-rate infusion studies are common for experimental determination of the steady-state K <subscript>p,ss</subscript> , while the tissue-plasma concentration ratio (C <subscript>T</subscript> /C <subscript>p</subscript> ) in the terminal phase after intravenous doses is often utilized. The Chen and Gross (C&G) method converts a terminal slope C <subscript>T</subscript> /C <subscript>p</subscript> to K <subscript>p,ss</subscript> based on assumptions of perfusion-limited distribution in tissue-plasma equilibration. However, considering blood flow (Q <subscript>T</subscript> ) and apparent tissue permeability (f <subscript>up</subscript> PS <subscript>in</subscript> ) in the rate of tissue distribution, this report extends the C&G method by utilizing a fractional distribution parameter (f <subscript>d</subscript> ).<br />Methods: Relevant PBPK equations for non-eliminating and eliminating organs along with lung and liver were derived for the conversion of C <subscript>T</subscript> /C <subscript>p</subscript> values to K <subscript>p,ss</subscript> . The relationships were demonstrated in rats with measured C <subscript>T</subscript> /C <subscript>p</subscript> and K <subscript>p,ss</subscript> values and the model-dependent f <subscript>d</subscript> for 8 compounds with a range of permeability coefficients. Several methods of assessing K <subscript>p</subscript> were compared.<br />Results: Utilizing f <subscript>d</subscript> in an extended C&G method, our estimations of K <subscript>p,ss</subscript> from C <subscript>T</subscript> /C <subscript>p</subscript> were improved, particularly for lower permeability compounds. However, four in silico methods for estimating K <subscript>p</subscript> performed poorly across tissues in comparison with measured K <subscript>p</subscript> values. Mathematical relationships between K <subscript>p</subscript> and K <subscript>p,ss</subscript> that are generally applicable for eliminating organs with tissue permeability limitations necessitates inclusion of an extraction ratio (ER) and f <subscript>d</subscript> .<br />Conclusion: Since many different types/sources of K <subscript>p</subscript> are present in the literature and used in PBPK models, these perspectives and equations should provide better insights in measuring and interpreting K <subscript>p</subscript> values in PBPK.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1573-904X
Volume :
39
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pharmaceutical research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35288804
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03211-3