Back to Search Start Over

Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Single-Centre Retrospective Study Comparing Microspheres Versus n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate.

Authors :
Salet E
Crombé A
Grenier N
Marcelin C
Lebras Y
Jambon E
Coussy A
Cornelis FH
Petitpierre F
Source :
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology [Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol] 2022 Jun; Vol. 45 (6), pp. 814-823. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 09.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue (NBCA) versus microspheres for prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).<br />Materials and Methods: This institutional review board-approved, single-centre, retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing PAE from September 2017 to July 2020. Age, medical history, previous treatment, pre- and post-PAE prostatic volumes and International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSSs) were systematically analysed. Procedural duration, dosimetry, immediate and delayed complications were recorded. Patients at the beginning of the study were treated with microspheres and patients at the end of the study with NBCA. The main outcome measures were the absolute and relative changes in IPSS at 3 months. Statistical analyses comprised unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon tests, Chi-2 tests, uni- and multivariate linear regressions.<br />Results: Sixty-two patients were included (median age: 65.9 years). Thirty-two patients were treated with microspheres and 30 with NBCA. There were no significant baseline differences between the two groups except for the baseline PSA (P = 0.0251). Average procedural and fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure were significantly lower in the NBCA group versus the microspheres group (80.7 ± 22.5 versus 112 ± 42.1 min [P = 0.0011], 24.2 ± 9.6 min versus 42.1 ± 20.2 min [P = 0.0001], 12,004.6 ± 6702 uGy.m <superscript>2</superscript> versus 25,614.9 ± 15,749.2 uGy.m <superscript>2</superscript> [P = 0.0001], respectively). Immediate complications were all minor, and there were no significant differences between the two groups (4/32 [12.5%] with microspheres versus 7/30 [23.3%] with NBCA, P = 0.4335), nor for delayed complications (P = 1). No association was found between the PAE techniques and the absolute change in IPSS at 3 months (-10.2 ± 7.9 with microspheres versus -9.5 ± 7.6 with NBCA, P = 0.7157).<br />Conclusion: PAE using NBCA was safe and effective for symptomatic BPO, with faster procedures, lower radiation exposure and similar safety and efficacy compared to microspheres. Operator learning curve could have biased the procedural times and radiation exposure between groups favouring NBCA.<br /> (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-086X
Volume :
45
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35266024
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03069-3