Back to Search Start Over

Intrapleural fibrinolysis and DNase versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of pleural empyema (FIVERVATS): protocol for a randomised, controlled trial - surgery as first-line treatment.

Authors :
Christensen TD
Bendixen M
Skaarup SH
Jensen JU
Petersen RH
Christensen M
Licht P
Neckelmann K
Bibby BM
Møller LB
Bodtger U
Borg MH
Saghir Z
Langfeldt S
Harders SMW
Bedawi EO
Naidu B
Rahman N
Laursen CB
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2022 Mar 09; Vol. 12 (3), pp. e054236. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 09.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: Pleural empyema is a frequent disease with a high morbidity and mortality. Current standard treatment includes antibiotics and thoracic ultrasound (TUS)-guided pigtail drainage. Simultaneously with drainage, an intrapleural fibrinolyticum can be given. A potential better alternative is surgery in terms of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) as first-line treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in outcome in patients diagnosed with complex parapneumonic effusion (stage II) and pleural empyema (stage III) who are treated with either VATS surgery or TUS-guided drainage and intrapleural therapy (fibrinolytic (Alteplase) with DNase (Pulmozyme)) as first-line treatment.<br />Methods and Analysis: A national, multicentre randomised, controlled study. Totally, 184 patients with a newly diagnosed community acquired complicated parapneumonic effusion or pleural empyema are randomised to either (1) VATS procedure with drainage or (2) TUS-guided pigtail catheter placement and intrapleural therapy with Actilyse and DNase. The total follow-up period is 12 months. The primary endpoint is length of hospital stay and secondary endpoints include for example, mortality, need for additional interventions, consumption of analgesia and quality of life.<br />Ethics and Dissemination: All patients provide informed consent before randomisation. The research project is carried out in accordance with the Helsinki II Declaration, European regulations and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Scientific Ethics Committees for Denmark and the Danish Data Protection Agency have provided permission. Information about the subjects is protected under the Personal Data Processing Act and the Health Act. The trial is registered at www.<br />Clinicaltrials: gov, and monitored by the regional Good clinical practice monitoring unit. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at various national and international conferences.<br />Trial Registration Number: NCT04095676.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: TDC has been on the speaker bureaus for AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche Diagnostics, Takeda, Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) and Bristol-Myers Squibb and has been in an Advisory Board for Bayer and Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD). RHP has received a speaker’s fee from Medtronic and on the advisory board for AstraZeneca. CBL has received a speaker’s fee from AstraZeneca. MB has received a teaching fee from Pulmonx Corporation. PL has received a speaker’s fee from Johnson & Johnson.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
12
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35264347
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054236