Back to Search Start Over

Limitations of the ARDS criteria during high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation: evidence from critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Authors :
Hultström M
Hellkvist O
Covaciu L
Fredén F
Frithiof R
Lipcsey M
Perchiazzi G
Pellegrini M
Source :
Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2022 Mar 07; Vol. 26 (1), pp. 55. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 07.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ) during invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is used as criteria to grade the severity of respiratory failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, the use of PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio has been increasingly used in non-invasive respiratory support such as high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). The grading of hypoxemia in non-invasively ventilated patients is uncertain. The main hypothesis, investigated in this study, was that the PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio does not change when switching between MV, NIV and HFNC.<br />Methods: We investigated respiratory function in critically ill patients with COVID-19 included in a single-center prospective observational study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden. In a steady state condition, the PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio was recorded before and after any change between two of the studied respiratory support techniques (i.e., HFNC, NIV and MV).<br />Results: A total of 148 patients were included in the present analysis. We find that any change in respiratory support from or to HFNC caused a significant change in PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio. Changes in respiratory support between NIV and MV did not show consistent change in PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio. In patients classified as mild to moderate ARDS during MV, the change from HFNC to MV showed a variable increase in PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio ranging between 52 and 140 mmHg (median of 127 mmHg). This made prediction of ARDS severity during MV from the apparent ARDS grade during HFNC impossible.<br />Conclusions: HFNC is associated with lower PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio than either NIV or MV in the same patient, while NIV and MV provided similar PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> and thus ARDS grade by Berlin definition. The large variation of PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /F <subscript>I</subscript> O <subscript>2</subscript> ratio indicates that great caution should be used when estimating ARDS grade as a measure of pulmonary damage during HFNC.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1466-609X
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35255949
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03933-1