Back to Search Start Over

Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Dysfunction: Retrospective Comparison of Post-thrombotic Percutaneous Endovascular Interventions with Pre-emptive Angioplasty.

Authors :
Hu X
Li B
Mao J
Hu X
Zhang J
Guo H
Wang D
Zhang Y
He J
Zhao N
Zhang H
Pang P
Source :
Annals of vascular surgery [Ann Vasc Surg] 2022 Aug; Vol. 84, pp. 286-297. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 03.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of pre-emptive angioplasty versus post-thrombotic percutaneous endovascular restoration of dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula (AVF).<br />Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the data from 80 patients who underwent 114 endovascular interventions for a malfunctioning AVF from July 2016 to August 2019. Stenotic AVFs were treated with pre-emptive angioplasty. Thrombosed AVFs were treated with percutaneous pharmacomechanical fibrinolysis with urokinase used only during the operation or continuously infused. The differences in patency rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, univariate and multivariate regression Cox models were used to determine influential factors on the postintervention primary patency.<br />Results: Post-thrombotic interventions and pre-emptive angioplasty yielded statistically similar rates in clinical success (100 vs. 100%), anatomic success (94 vs. 89%; P = 0.52), complication (4 vs. 11%; P = 0.29), as well as postintervention primary, assisted primary and secondary patency (P = 0.80; 0.57; 0.57). The use of pre-emptive angioplasty was associated with reduced total cost (¥25,108 vs. ¥30,833, P < 0.001). The patients who used urokinase only during the operation prolonged both the primary and assisted primary patency (P = 0.02; 0.002), while those with continuous infusion of urokinase had worst patency rates and high costs (¥39,275 vs. ¥25,108 vs. ¥27,140, P < 0.001). Compared with the other locations, dysfunction in the anastomotic or juxta-anastomotic segment (HR = 0.41, P = 0.001) was associated with prolonged postintervention primary patency.<br />Conclusions: No clinical outcome differences were found between the post-thrombotic percutaneous endovascular interventions and pre-emptive angioplasty. However, pre-emptive angioplasty decreased access expenditure.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1615-5947
Volume :
84
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of vascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35247533
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.01.023