Transfer Patient Imaging: A Novel Peer Feedback Program Beyond Institutional Boundaries.

Background: At our level 1 trauma center, we overread cross-sectional scans on all transferred patients, initially reported by community radiologists (CR). We designed a unique peer feedback learning model to address discrepancies encountered with outside overreads with the goal of practice improvement on the part of the CRs. Although there is ample literature on internal peer review and peer learning programs, no publications address errors committed by peers outside institutional boundaries. In this paper we describe our model and report a survey analyzing the perception of the program by the CRs.
Materials and Methods: Outside CT and MR exams and reports of patients transferred to our level 1 trauma center were imported into PACS and prospectively overread by specialist trauma radiologists. Our report contained a summary of the outside findings as well as our findings. In the case of a significant discrepancy, a paper copy of our final report was sent by US mail to the originating CR. When the program had been active for 18 months, an invitation to participate in a survey was sent to all radiologists who had been sent reports.
Results: Eight thousand three hundred forty patients were transferred, of which 4331 (52%) had 9175 exams with outside reports (8666 CT scans and 509 MRI). One hundred seventy six final report letters containing significant discrepancies were sent to 139 individual radiologists. These 139 radiologists also later received our survey letter. Thirty-eight (27%) responses were received. Thirty-two respondents (84%) recalled receiving the report and reviewed the exam in question. Twenty-eight of them (85%) agreed with the overread and 30 (88%) believed that our feedback program should be continued.
Conclusion: We have designed a novel peer feedback learning model to address discrepancies in outside overreads which is administratively simple and well received by the CRs getting feedback. Those CR who responded to the survey rated the experience favorably and wanted the practice continued, although the overall response rate did not allow statistical analysis. Also, institutions trying to design similar or new peer learning models can benefit from our experience.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)