Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of 22-gauge standard and Franseen needles in EUS-guided tissue acquisition for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Itonaga M
Yasukawa S
Fukutake N
Ogura T
Asada M
Shimokawa T
Inatomi O
Nakai Y
Shiomi H
Nebiki H
Suzuki A
Kitagawa K
Asai S
Shimatani M
Sanuki T
Kurita A
Takenaka M
Yoshida M
Hoki N
Yasuda H
Maruyama H
Matsumoto H
Yanagisawa A
Kitano M
Source :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2022 Jul; Vol. 96 (1), pp. 57-66.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 11.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and Aims: This large multicenter randomized controlled trial compared the diagnostic yields of 22-gauge standard and 22-gauge Franseen needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) of solid pancreatic lesions.<br />Methods: Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions were prospectively randomized to EUS-TA using standard or Franseen needles. Samples obtained with the first needle pass and with second and subsequent passes were evaluated separately. The primary endpoint was the rate of accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy. Other endpoints were technical success rate, sample cellularity, adverse events, diagnostic accuracy in patient subgroups, and the diagnostic accuracy and numbers of second and subsequent needle passes.<br />Results: Of 523 patients undergoing EUS-TA, 260 were randomized to using standard 22-gauge needles and 263 to 22-gauge Franseen needles. The technical success rate in each group was 99.6%, with similar adverse event rates in the standard (1.5%) and Franseen (.8%) needle groups. First-pass EUS-TA using the Franseen needle resulted in significantly greater diagnostic accuracy (84.0% vs 71.2%, P < .001) and sensitivity (82.4% vs 66.7%, P < .001) than first-pass EUS-TA using a standard needle and also resulted in superior diagnostic accuracy in patients requiring immunostaining. Second and subsequent EUS-TA using Franseen needles showed significantly greater accuracy (94.7% vs 90.0%, P = .049) and sensitivity (94.0% vs 88.6%, P = .047) and required fewer needle passes (1.81 vs 2.03, P = .008) than using standard needles.<br />Conclusions: EUS-TA with the Franseen needle is superior to EUS-TA with a standard needle with respect to diagnostic accuracy per pass, particularly in patients who require immunostaining, and number of passes when using macroscopic on-site evaluation. (Clinical trial registration numbers: UMIN000030634 and jRCTs052180062.).<br /> (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6779
Volume :
96
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35151711
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.005