Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes Among Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients After an Interim PET Scan: A Real-World Experience.

Authors :
Hamid MS
Rutherford SC
Jang H
Kim S
Patel K
Bartlett NL
Malecek MK
Watkins MP
Maddocks KJ
Bond DA
Feldman TA
Magarelli G
Advani RH
Spinner MA
Evens AM
Shah M
Ahmed S
Stephens DM
Allen P
Tees MT
Karmali R
Cheson BD
Yazdy MS
Strouse C
Bailey NA
Pagel JM
Ramchandren R
Source :
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia [Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk] 2022 Jul; Vol. 22 (7), pp. e435-e442. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 25.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: The utility of dose escalation after positive positron emission tomography following 2 cycles of ABVD (PET2) for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) remains controversial. We describe the United States real-world practice patterns for PET2 positive patients.<br />Patients and Methods: Data was collected from 15 sites on PET2 positive HL patients after receiving frontline treatment between January, 2015 and June, 2019. Descriptive analyses between those with therapy change and those continuing initial therapy were assessed.<br />Results: A total of 129 patients were identified; 111 (86%) were treated with ABVD therapy and 18 (14%) with an alternate regimen. At PET2 assessment, 74.4% (96/129) had Deauville score (DS) 4 and 25.6% (33/129) had DS 5. Of the 66 limited stage (LS) patients with PET2 DS score of 4/5, 77.3% (51/66) continued initial therapy and 22.7% (15/66) changed to escalated therapy. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) for DS 4/5 LS patients was 67.0% (95% CI; 54.9-81.7) for patients without escalation compared with 51.4% (95% CI; 30.8-85.8) for those who escalated. Of the 63 DS 4/5 patients with advanced stage (AS) disease, 76.2% (48/63) continued initial therapy and 23.8% (15/63) changed to escalated therapy. The 12-month PFS for DS 4/5 AS patients was 38.3% (95% CI: 26.3%-55.7%) for patients without escalation compared with 57.1% (95% CI: 36.3-89.9) for those with escalation.<br />Conclusion: A minority of PET2 positive HL patients undergo therapy escalation and outcomes remain overall suboptimal. Improved prognostics markers and better therapeutics are required to improve outcomes for high-risk PET2 positive HL patients.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2152-2669
Volume :
22
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35093285
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.12.012