Back to Search Start Over

Stroke Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Determinants, Short and Long Term Impact.

Authors :
Kamman AV
van Bakel PAJ
Yang B
Williams DM
Kim KM
Khaja MS
Moll FL
van Herwaarden JA
Trimarchi S
Eagle KA
Eliason JL
Patel HJ
Source :
Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2023 Spring; Vol. 35 (1), pp. 19-30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 26.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

We performed a contemporary assessment of clinical and radiographic factors of stroke after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Patients undergoing TEVAR from 2006 to 2017 were identified. We assessed clinical and radiographic data, including preoperative head and neck computed tomography, Doppler ultrasonography, and intraoperative angiography. Our primary outcome was stroke after TEVAR. Four hundred seventy-nine patients underwent TEVAR, mean age 68.1 ± 19.5 years, 52.6% male. Indications for TEVAR included aneurysms (n = 238, 49.7%) or dissections (n = 152, 31.7%). Ishimaru landing zones were Zone 2 (n = 225, 47.0%), Zone 3 (n = 151, 31.5%), or Zone 4 (n = 103, 21.5%). Stroke occurred in 3.8% (n = 18) of patients, with 1.9% (8) major events (modified Rankin Scale >3). Pathophysiology was predominantly embolic (n = 14), and occurred in posterior (n = 6), anterior (n = 6), or combined circulation (n = 4), and in the left hemisphere (n = 10) or bilateral (n = 6). Univariate analysis suggested use of lumbar drain (33.3% versus 57.2%, P = 0.04), inability to revascularize the left subclavian artery (16.7% vs 5.2%, P = 0.04) and number of implanted components (2.5 ± 1.2 vs 2.0 ± 0.97, P = 0.03) were associated with stroke. Multivariable analysis identified number of implanted components (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.17-2.67 P = 0.00) and inability to revascularize the left subclavian artery as independent predictors of stroke. Stroke was associated with a higher perioperative mortality (27.8% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01). Stroke after TEVAR is primarily embolic in nature and related to both anatomic and procedural factors. This may have important implications for device development in the era of endovascular arch repair.<br /> (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-9488
Volume :
35
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35091051
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.08.030