Back to Search Start Over

Carboplatin-Cyclophosphamide or Paclitaxel without or with Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (BOOG 2013-01).

Authors :
van Rossum AGJ
Mandjes IAM
van Werkhoven E
van Tinteren H
van Leeuwen-Stok AE
Nederlof P
Portielje JEA
van Alphen RJ
Platte E
van den Broek D
Huitema A
Kok M
Linn SC
Oosterkamp HM
Source :
Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) [Breast Care (Basel)] 2021 Dec; Vol. 16 (6), pp. 598-606. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 22.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy conferred a modest progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). However, no overall survival (OS) benefit has been reported. Also, its combination with carboplatin-cyclophosphamide (CC) has never been investigated.<br />Methods: The Triple-B study is a multicenter, randomized phase IIb trial that aims to prospectively validate predictive biomarkers, including baseline plasma vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (pVEGFR-2), for bevacizumab benefit. mTNBC patients were randomized between CC and paclitaxel (P) without or with bevacizumab (CC ± B or P ± B). Here we report on a preplanned safety and preliminary efficacy analysis after the first 12 patients had been treated with CC+B and on the predictive value of pVEGFR-2.<br />Results: In 58 patients, the median follow-up was 22.1 months. Toxicity was manageable and consistent with what was known for each agent separately. There was a trend toward a prolonged PFS with bevacizumab compared to chemotherapy only (7.0 vs. 5.2 months; adjusted HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.33-1.08; p = 0.09), but there was no effect on OS. In this small study, pVEGFR-2 concentration did not predict a bevacizumab PFS benefit. Both the intention-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis did not yield a significant treatment-by-biomarker test for interaction ( p <subscript>interaction</subscript> = 0.69).<br />Conclusions: CC and CC+B are safe first-line regimens for mTNBC and the side effects are consistent with those known for each individual agent. pVEGFR-2 concentration did not predict a bevacizumab PFS benefit.<br />Competing Interests: S.C.L. is an advisory board member for Cergentis, IBM, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi and received institutional research support funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Roche, Sanofi, and TESARO. H.M.O. is an advisory board member for Roche, Pfizer, and Novartis and received institutional research support funding from Roche. M.K. is an advisory board member for BMS and received institutional research support funding from Roche and BMS. All of the other authors declare no potential conflict of interests.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1661-3791
Volume :
16
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35087363
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000512200