Back to Search Start Over

Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.

Authors :
Muraca GM
Boutin A
Razaz N
Lisonkova S
John S
Ting JY
Scott H
Kramer MS
Joseph KS
Source :
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne [CMAJ] 2022 Jan 10; Vol. 194 (1), pp. E1-E12.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is considered safe if carried out by trained personnel. However, opportunities for training in OVD have declined and, given these shifts in practice, the safety of OVD is unknown. We estimated incidence rates of trauma following OVD in Canada, and quantified variation in trauma rates by instrument, region, level of obstetric care and institutional OVD volume.<br />Methods: We conducted a cohort study of all singleton, term deliveries in Canada between April 2013 and March 2019, excluding Quebec. Our main outcome measures were maternal trauma (e.g., obstetric anal sphincter injury, high vaginal lacerations) and neonatal trauma (e.g., subgaleal hemorrhage, brachial plexus injury). We calculated adjusted and stabilized rates of trauma using mixed-effects logistic regression.<br />Results: Of 1 326 191 deliveries, 38 500 (2.9%) were attempted forceps deliveries and 110 987 (8.4%) were attempted vacuum deliveries. The maternal trauma rate following forceps delivery was 25.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.8%-25.7%) and the neonatal trauma rate was 9.6 (95% CI 8.6-10.6) per 1000 live births. Maternal and neonatal trauma rates following vacuum delivery were 13.2% (95% CI 13.0%-13.4%) and 9.6 (95% CI 9.0-10.2) per 1000 live births, respectively. Maternal trauma rates remained higher with forceps than with vacuum after adjustment for confounders (adjusted rate ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.65-1.75) and varied by region, but not by level of obstetric care.<br />Interpretation: In Canada, rates of trauma following OVD are higher than previously reported, irrespective of region, level of obstetric care and volume of OVD among hospitals. These results support a reassessment of OVD safety in Canada.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: Michael Kramer reports funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Family Rosenquist Foundation, outside the submitted work. He also reports participation on the data safety monitoring board of the MOBYDick clinical trial and on the scientific advisory board of the Family Rosenquist Foundation.<br /> (© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1488-2329
Volume :
194
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35012946
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210841