Back to Search Start Over

Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors :
Seraphim A
Knott KD
Augusto JB
Menacho K
Tyebally S
Dowsing B
Bhattacharyya S
Menezes LJ
Jones DA
Uppal R
Moon JC
Manisty C
Source :
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine [Front Cardiovasc Med] 2021 Dec 23; Vol. 8, pp. 795195. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 23 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery effectively relieves symptoms and improves outcomes. However, patients undergoing CABG surgery typically have advanced coronary atherosclerotic disease and remain at high risk for symptom recurrence and adverse events. Functional non-invasive testing for ischaemia is commonly used as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary and graft angiography, and for guiding subsequent revascularisation decisions. However, performing and interpreting non-invasive ischaemia testing in patients post CABG is challenging, irrespective of the imaging modality used. Multiple factors including advanced multi-vessel native vessel disease, variability in coronary hemodynamics post-surgery, differences in graft lengths and vasomotor properties, and complex myocardial scar morphology are only some of the pathophysiological mechanisms that complicate ischaemia evaluation in this patient population. Systematic assessment of the impact of these challenges in relation to each imaging modality may help optimize diagnostic test selection by incorporating clinical information and individual patient characteristics. At the same time, recent technological advances in cardiac imaging including improvements in image quality, wider availability of quantitative techniques for measuring myocardial blood flow and the introduction of artificial intelligence-based approaches for image analysis offer the opportunity to re-evaluate the value of ischaemia testing, providing new insights into the pathophysiological processes that determine outcomes in this patient population.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Seraphim, Knott, Augusto, Menacho, Tyebally, Dowsing, Bhattacharyya, Menezes, Jones, Uppal, Moon and Manisty.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2297-055X
Volume :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35004905
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.795195