Back to Search Start Over

SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Rate and Estimated Effectiveness of the Inactivated Whole Virion Vaccine BBV152 Against Reinfection Among Health Care Workers in New Delhi, India.

Authors :
Malhotra S
Mani K
Lodha R
Bakhshi S
Mathur VP
Gupta P
Kedia S
Sankar J
Kumar P
Kumar A
Ahuja V
Sinha S
Guleria R
Dua A
Ahmad S
Sathiyamoorthy R
Sharma A
Sakya T
Gaur V
Chaudhary S
Sharma S
Madan D
Gupta A
Virmani S
Gupta A
Yadav N
Sachdeva S
Sharma S
Singh S
Pandey A
Singh M
Jhurani D
Sarkar S
Lokade AK
Mohammad A
Pandit S
Dubey R
Singh AK
Gohar N
Soni D
Bhattacharyya A
Rai S
Tummala S
Gupta I
Shukla S
Source :
JAMA network open [JAMA Netw Open] 2022 Jan 04; Vol. 5 (1), pp. e2142210. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 04.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Importance: A surge of COVID-19 occurred from March to June 2021, in New Delhi, India, linked to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out for health care workers (HCWs) starting in January 2021.<br />Objective: To assess the incidence density of reinfection among a cohort of HCWs and estimate the effectiveness of the inactivated whole virion vaccine BBV152 against reinfection.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study among HCWs working at a tertiary care center in New Delhi, India.<br />Exposures: Vaccination with 0, 1, or 2 doses of BBV152.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: The HCWs were categorized as fully vaccinated (with 2 doses and ≥15 days after the second dose), partially vaccinated (with 1 dose or 2 doses with <15 days after the second dose), or unvaccinated. The incidence density of COVID-19 reinfection per 100 person-years was computed, and events from March 3, 2020, to June 18, 2021, were included for analysis. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Estimated vaccine effectiveness (1 - adjusted HR) was reported.<br />Results: Among 15 244 HCWs who participated in the study, 4978 (32.7%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean (SD) age was 36.6 (10.3) years, and 55.0% were male. The reinfection incidence density was 7.26 (95% CI: 6.09-8.66) per 100 person-years (124 HCWs [2.5%], total person follow-up period of 1696 person-years as time at risk). Fully vaccinated HCWs had lower risk of reinfection (HR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.08-0.23]), symptomatic reinfection (HR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.07-0.24]), and asymptomatic reinfection (HR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.05-0.53]) compared with unvaccinated HCWs. Accordingly, among the 3 vaccine categories, reinfection was observed in 60 of 472 (12.7%) of unvaccinated (incidence density, 18.05 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 14.02-23.25), 39 of 356 (11.0%) of partially vaccinated (incidence density 15.62 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 11.42-21.38), and 17 of 1089 (1.6%) fully vaccinated (incidence density 2.18 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.35-3.51) HCWs. The estimated effectiveness of BBV152 against reinfection was 86% (95% CI, 77%-92%); symptomatic reinfection, 87% (95% CI, 76%-93%); and asymptomatic reinfection, 84% (95% CI, 47%-95%) among fully vaccinated HCWs. Partial vaccination was not associated with reduced risk of reinfection.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that BBV152 was associated with protection against both symptomatic and asymptomatic reinfection in HCWs after a complete vaccination schedule, when the predominant circulating variant was B.1.617.2.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2574-3805
Volume :
5
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA network open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34994793
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42210