Back to Search Start Over

Reduced Stocking Density and Provision of Straw in a Rack Improve Pig Welfare on Commercial Fattening Farms.

Authors :
Schodl K
Wiesauer L
Winckler C
Leeb C
Source :
Frontiers in veterinary science [Front Vet Sci] 2021 Dec 08; Vol. 8, pp. 656211. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 08 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of reduced stocking density in combination with provision of additional enrichment material on pig welfare on-farm. On three growing-finishing farms in Austria, in total 974, 413, and 70 pigs were kept at 1 m <superscript>2</superscript> /pig and straw or hay in a rack as additional enrichment material (improved pens, IP; n = 6-38 pens per farm) or in pens complying with the minimum legal requirements of 0.7 m <superscript>2</superscript> /pig (control pens, CP; n = 6-37 pens per farm). Behavior as well as skin, tail and ear lesions and pig soiling were assessed at the beginning and in the middle of the fattening period, while performance data were recorded at the end of the fattening period. Data analysis was performed for each farm separately using generalized linear and linear mixed models or Mann-Whitney U-Test. Pigs in IP less frequently manipulated pen mates' ears (Farm 1: P t r e a t m e n t * a s s e s s m e n t = 0.002 ; Farm 2: P = 0.002 ) and body (Farm 1: P = 0.021; Farm 2: P = 0.015 ) than in CP. Prevalence of skin, tail and ear lesions and soiled pigs did not differ between treatments. In only one farm, average daily weight gain was higher in IP than in CP (Farm 1: P = 0.003 ). Our findings indicate that increased space allowance and provision of substrate can improve aspects of animal welfare within existing pig fattening systems, without requiring irreversible constructional modifications to the system.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Schodl, Wiesauer, Winckler and Leeb.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2297-1769
Volume :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in veterinary science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34957270
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.656211