Back to Search Start Over

Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Following Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors :
Muntané-Carol G
Okoh AK
Chen C
Nault I
Kassotis J
Mohammadi S
Coromilas J
Lee LY
Alperi A
Philippon F
Russo MJ
Rodés-Cabau J
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2021 Dec 27; Vol. 14 (24), pp. 2711-2722.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of delayed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a minimalist approach followed by ambulatory electrocardiographic (AECG) monitoring.<br />Background: Little is known regarding the clinical impact of HAVB or CHB in the early period after discharge following TAVR.<br />Methods: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted, including 459 consecutive TAVR patients without permanent pacemaker who underwent continuous AECG monitoring for 14 days (median length of hospital stay 2 days; IQR: 1-3 days), using 2 devices (CardioSTAT and Zio AT). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HAVB or CHB. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) no right bundle branch block (RBBB) and no electrocardiographic (ECG) changes; 2) baseline RBBB with no further changes; and 3) new-onset ECG conduction disturbances.<br />Results: Delayed HAVB or CHB episodes occurred in 21 patients (4.6%) (median 5 days postprocedure; IQR: 4-6 days), leading to PPM in 17 (81.0%). HAVB or CHB events were rare in group 1 (7 of 315 [2.2%]), and the incidence increased in group 2 (5 of 38 [13.2%]; P < 0.001 vs group 1) and group 3 (9 of 106 [8.5%]; P = 0.007 vs group 1; P = 0.523 vs group 2). No episodes of sudden or all-cause death occurred at 30-day follow-up.<br />Conclusions: Systematic 2-week AECG monitoring following minimalist TAVR detected HAVB and CHB episodes in about 5% of cases, with no mortality at 1 month. Whereas HAVB or CHB was rare in patients without ECG changes post-TAVR, baseline RBBB and new-onset conduction disturbances determined an increased risk. These results would support tailored management using AECG monitoring and the possibility of longer hospitalization periods in patients at higher risk for delayed HAVB or CHB.<br />Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Muntané-Carol and Dr Alperi were supported by a grant from Fundación Alfonso Martin Escudero (Madrid, Spain). Dr Rodés-Cabau holds the Research Chair “Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière” for the Development of Structural Heart Disease Interventions; and has received institutional research grants from and is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7605
Volume :
14
Issue :
24
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34949396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.039