Back to Search Start Over

Congenital Aural Stenosis With Cholesteatoma.

Authors :
Casazza GC
Jonas RH
Kesser BW
Source :
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology [Otol Neurotol] 2022 Mar 01; Vol. 43 (3), pp. 320-327.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: Compare surgical and audiological outcomes of patients with congenital aural stenosis (CAS) with cholesteatoma to patients with CAS without cholesteatoma and patients with complete congenital aural atresia (CCAA).<br />Study Design: Retrospective case series.<br />Setting: Tertiary care hospital.<br />Patients: Patients with CAS (with and without cholesteatoma) and CCAA.<br />Intervention: Surgery for CAS/CAA.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Patients with CAS and CAA undergoing surgical repair from June 2004 to July 2020 were identified from an institutional database. Included patients were divided by presence of a canal cholesteatoma. Clinical history, pre- and postoperative audiometric data, and clinical outcomes were compared.<br />Results: Of the 283 patients (300 ears), 18 (19 ears) had a canal cholesteatoma. When compared to ears without cholesteatoma (CCAA ears plus CAS ears without cholesteatoma), ears with cholesteatoma were more likely to be younger (9.2 ± 6.6 vs. 11.5 ± 9.2; p = 0.015), female (66.7% vs. 38.1%; p = 0.02; OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.18-8.9), and have normal/Grade I microtia (47.4% vs. 9.6%; p < 0.0001; OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.044-0.32), but not a history of draining ear (5.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.05; OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.004-0.999). Preoperative audiometric data demonstrated a lower mean air-bone gap (45.8 dB vs. 52.3 dB; p = 0.009) and better speech reception threshold (48.7 dB vs. 57.4 dB; p = 0.0004) in cholesteatoma ears. Postoperatively, ears with cholesteatoma were more likely to close the ABG within 20 dB (p = 0.001; OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.072-0.52). No patient in the cholesteatoma group developed post-operative bony/soft-tissue stenosis (0% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.65; OR 1.61; 0.21-12.6) or required revision surgery (0% vs. 11%; p = 0.38; OR 2.46, 0.32-19).<br />Conclusions: Patients with CAS and cholesteatoma have better audiometric outcomes and likely a more durable repair with a decreased need for revision possibly secondary to greater embryologic development of the meatus, ear canal, and middle ear space despite the cholesteatoma.<br />Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-4505
Volume :
43
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34889827
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003440