Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy according to drug-eluting stent type: the TWILIGHT-STENT study.

Authors :
Dangas G
Baber U
Sharma S
Giustino G
Sartori S
Nicolas J
Goel R
Mehta S
Cohen D
Angiolillo DJ
Zhang Z
Camaj A
Cao D
Briguori C
Dudek D
Escaned J
Huber K
Collier T
Kornowski R
Kunadian V
Moliterno DJ
Ohman EM
Weisz G
Gil R
Krucoff MW
Kaul U
Oldroyd KG
Sardella G
Shlofmitz R
Witzenbichler B
Kastrati A
Han YL
Steg PG
Pocock S
Gibson CM
Mehran R
Source :
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology [EuroIntervention] 2022 Mar 18; Vol. 17 (16), pp. 1330-1339.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: In the TWILIGHT trial, ticagrelor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was shown to be a safe bleeding avoidance strategy in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES).<br />Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ticagrelor monotherapy after three-month DAPT in patients undergoing PCI, according to DES type.<br />Methods: In the current sub-analysis from TWILIGHT, patients were stratified into three groups based on DES type: durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES), durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (DP-ZES), and biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES). Bleeding and ischaemic outcomes were assessed at one year after randomisation.<br />Results: Out of 5,769 patients, 3,014 (52.2%) had DP-EES, 1,350 (23.4%) had DP-ZES and 1,405 (24.4%) had BP-DES. Compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor monotherapy had significantly lower BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding compared with DAPT; DP-EES (3.8% vs 6.7%; HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.78), DP-ZES (4.6% vs 6.9%; HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.42-1.04) and BP-DES (4.2% vs 7.9%; HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33-0.81; p <subscript>interaction</subscript> =0.76). Ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in similar rates of death, MI, or stroke: DP-EES (4.2% vs 4.3%; HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.68-1.37); DP-ZES (4.1% vs 3.1%; HR 1.32; 95% CI: 0.75-2.33); BP-DES (3.9% vs 4.2%; HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.54-1.55; p <subscript>interaction</subscript> =0.60). In both unadjusted and covariate-adjusted analyses, DES type was not associated with any differences in ischaemic or bleeding complications.<br />Conclusions: As compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor monotherapy after a short DAPT duration lowered bleeding complications without increasing the ischaemic risk, irrespective of DES type. We observed no significant differences among DES types.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1969-6213
Volume :
17
Issue :
16
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34881696
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00721