Back to Search Start Over

Instantaneous wave-free ratio for guiding treatment of nonculprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective study.

Authors :
Hidalgo F
Gonzalez-Manzanares R
Ojeda S
Benito-González T
Gutiérrez-Barrios A
De la Torre Hernández JM
Minguito-Carazo C
Izaga-Torralba E
Cabrera-Rubio I
Flores-Vergara G
de Lezo JS
Romero-Moreno M
de Prado AP
Pan M
Source :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2022 Feb; Vol. 99 (2), pp. 489-496. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of a physiological coronary evaluation with the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) of nonculprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) successfully revascularized.<br />Methods: A multicenter registry including patients of four high-volume PCI centers with ACS and underwent successful revascularization of the culprit vessel and had other nonculprit lesions that were physiologically evaluated with the iFR between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, probable or definitive stent thrombosis and new revascularization (MACEs).<br />Results: A total of 356 patients with 472 nonculprit lesions were included. The mean age was 66 ± 11 years. The clinical presentation was ACS without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) in 235 patients (66%) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 121 patients (34%). After a median follow-up period of 21 (14-30) months, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 patients (9%). There were no differences in outcomes regarding clinical presentation (NSTEMI vs. NSTE-ACS, 9.1 vs. 8.9%, p <subscript>adj</subscript>  = 0.570) or iFR induced treatment strategy (patients with all lesions revascularized vs. patients with at least one lesion with an iFR > 0.89 deferred for revascularization, 10.5 vs. 8.4%, p <subscript>adj</subscript>  = 0.476).<br />Conclusions: The use of the iFR to guide percutaneous coronary intervention decision making in nonculprit lesions seems to be feasible, with an acceptable percentage of MACEs at the mid-term follow-up. Patients with deferred revascularization of lesions without physiological significance and patients undergoing complete revascularization had a similar risk of MACEs.<br /> (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-726X
Volume :
99
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34862839
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30025