Back to Search Start Over

Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors :
Fernando SM
Tran A
Sadeghirad B
Burns KEA
Fan E
Brodie D
Munshi L
Goligher EC
Cook DJ
Fowler RA
Herridge MS
Cardinal P
Jaber S
Møller MH
Thille AW
Ferguson ND
Slutsky AS
Brochard LJ
Seely AJE
Rochwerg B
Source :
Intensive care medicine [Intensive Care Med] 2022 Feb; Vol. 48 (2), pp. 137-147. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 25.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: Systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of noninvasive respiratory strategies, including noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), in reducing extubation failure among critically ill adults.<br />Methods: We searched databases from inception through October 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating noninvasive respiratory support therapies (NIPPV, HFNC, conventional oxygen therapy, or a combination of these) following extubation in critically ill adults. Two reviewers performed screening, full text review, and extraction independently. The primary outcome of interest was reintubation. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of our findings.<br />Results: We included 36 RCTs (6806 patients). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, NIPPV (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.52-0.82]) and HFNC (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.45-0.87]) reduced reintubation (both moderate certainty). Sensitivity analyses showed that the magnitude of the effect was highest in patients with increased baseline risk of reintubation. As compared to HFNC, no difference in incidence of reintubation was seen with NIPPV (OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.78-1.38], low certainty). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, neither NIPPV (OR 0.8 [95% CI 0.61-1.04], moderate certainty) or HFNC (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.66-1.24], low certainty) reduced short-term mortality. Consistent findings were demonstrated across multiple subgroups, including high- and low-risk patients. These results were replicated when evaluating noninvasive strategies for prevention (prophylaxis), but not in rescue (application only after evidence of deterioration) situations.<br />Conclusions: Our findings suggest that both NIPPV and HFNC reduced reintubation in critically ill adults, compared to conventional oxygen therapy. NIPPV did not reduce incidence of reintubation when compared to HFNC. These findings support the preventative application of noninvasive respiratory support strategies to mitigate extubation failure in critically ill adults, but not in rescue conditions.<br /> (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1238
Volume :
48
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Intensive care medicine
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
34825256
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06581-1