Back to Search Start Over

The Performance and Trajectory of Medical Students With Disabilities: Results From a Multisite, Multicohort Study.

Authors :
Meeks LM
Plegue M
Swenor BK
Moreland CJ
Jain S
Grabowski CJ
Westervelt M
Case B
Eidtson WH
Patwari R
Angoff NR
LeConche J
Temple BM
Poullos P
Sanchez-Guzman M
Coates C
Low C
Henderson MC
Purkiss J
Kim MH
Source :
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges [Acad Med] 2022 Mar 01; Vol. 97 (3), pp. 389-397.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a post-Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 multisite, multicohort study called the Pathways Project to assess the performance and trajectory of medical students with disabilities (SWDs).<br />Method: From June to December 2020, the authors conducted a matched cohort study of SWDs and nondisabled controls from 2 graduating cohorts (2018 and 2019) across 11 U.S. MD-granting medical schools. Each SWD was matched with 2 controls, one from their institution and, whenever possible, one from their cohort for Medical College Admission Test score and self-reported gender. Outcome measures included final attempt Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, time to graduation, leave of absence, matching on first attempt, and matching to primary care.<br />Results: A total of 171 SWDs and 341 controls were included; the majority of SWDs had cognitive/learning disabilities (118/171, 69.0%). Compared with controls, SWDs with physical/sensory disabilities had similar times to graduation (88.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.0, 100.0 vs 95.1%, 95% CI: 90.3, 99.8; P = .20), Step 1 scores (229.6 vs 233.4; P = .118), and match on first attempt (93.9%, 95% CI: 86.9, 100.0 vs 94.6%, 95% CI: 91.8, 97.4; P = .842), while SWDs with cognitive/learning disabilities had lower Step 1 scores (219.4; P < .001) and were less likely to graduate on time (81.2%, 95% CI: 69.2, 93.2; P = .003) and match on first attempt (85.3%, 95% CI: 78.0, 92.7; P = .009). Accommodated SWDs had Step 1 scores that were 5.9 points higher than nonaccommodated SWDs (95% CI: -0.7, 12.5; P = .08).<br />Conclusions: Structural barriers remain for SWDs with cognitive/learning disabilities, which could be partially mitigated by accommodations on high-stakes exams.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1938-808X
Volume :
97
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34817411
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004510