Back to Search
Start Over
New technology REMS for bone evaluation compared to DXA in adult women for the osteoporosis diagnosis: a real-life experience.
- Source :
-
Archives of osteoporosis [Arch Osteoporos] 2021 Nov 16; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 175. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 16. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Osteoporosis is a prevalent skeletal disorder in postmenopausal women. REMS represents a potential technology for osteoporosis diagnosis in clinical practice.<br />Objective: To assess the accuracy of Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) technology in diagnosing osteoporosis in comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on a population of Brazilian women.<br />Methods: A population of women age ranged between 30 and 80 was recruited at DXA Service of São Paulo School-Hospital, Brazil. They underwent REMS and DXA scans at the axial sites. The REMS accuracy for the osteoporosis diagnosis was evaluated in comparison with DXA on both sites. The intra-operator and inter-operator coefficient of variation (CV) was also calculated.<br />Results: A total of 343 patients were enrolled in the study. Erroneous scans due to poor quality acquisitions with both methods or to other technical reasons were excluded; 227 lumbar spine exams and 238 hip exams were acceptable for comparison analysis. The comparison between REMS and DXA outcomes showed that the average difference in BMD (expressed as bias±1.96 SD) was -0.026±0.179g/cm <superscript>2</superscript> for the spine and -0.027±0.156g/cm <superscript>2</superscript> for the femoral neck. When accepted 0.3 tolerance on T-score, there were no cases diagnosed as osteoporosis by DXA that were defined as normal by REMS. The REMS intra-operator CV was 0.51% for the lumbar spine and 1.08% for the femoral neck. The REMS inter-operator CV was 1.43% for the lumbar spine and 1.93% for the femoral neck.<br />Conclusion: The REMS approach had high accuracy for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in comparison with DXA in adult women. According to our results, this new technology has shown to be a promising alternative for populations without access to DXA densitometry.<br /> (© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1862-3514
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Archives of osteoporosis
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34786596
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00990-x