Back to Search
Start Over
Longitudinal Doppler Assessments in Late Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction.
- Source :
-
Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980) [Ultraschall Med] 2023 Feb; Vol. 44 (1), pp. 56-67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 12. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To assess the longitudinal variation of the ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility index (UCR) in late preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR).<br />Materials and Methods: A prospective European multicenter observational study included women with a singleton pregnancy, 32 <superscript>+ 0</superscript> -36 <superscript>+ 6</superscript> , at risk of FGR (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or abdominal circumference [AC] < 10 <superscript>th</superscript> percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler or fall in AC from 20-week scan of > 40 percentile points). The primary outcome was a composite of abnormal condition at birth or major neonatal morbidity. UCR was categorized as normal (< 0.9) or abnormal (≥ 0.9). UCR was assessed by gestational age at measurement interval to delivery, and by individual linear regression coefficient in women with two or more measurements.<br />Results: 856 women had 2770 measurements; 696 (81 %) had more than one measurement (median 3 (IQR 2-4). At inclusion, 63 (7 %) a UCR ≥ 0.9. These delivered earlier and had a lower birth weight and higher incidence of adverse outcome (30 % vs. 9 %, relative risk 3.2; 95 %CI 2.1-5.0) than women with a normal UCR at inclusion. Repeated measurements after an abnormal UCR at inclusion were abnormal again in 67 % (95 %CI 55-80), but after a normal UCR the chance of finding an abnormal UCR was 6 % (95 %CI 5-7 %). The risk of composite adverse outcome was similar using the first or subsequent UCR values.<br />Conclusion: An abnormal UCR is likely to be abnormal again at a later measurement, while after a normal UCR the chance of an abnormal UCR is 5-7 % when repeated weekly. Repeated measurements do not predict outcome better than the first measurement, most likely due to the most compromised fetuses being delivered after an abnormal UCR.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1438-8782
- Volume :
- 44
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34768305
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1511-8293