Back to Search Start Over

Longitudinal Doppler Assessments in Late Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction.

Authors :
Mylrea-Foley B
Wolf H
Stampalija T
Lees C
Arabin B
Berger A
Bergman E
Bhide A
Bilardo CM
Breeze AC
Brodszki J
Calda P
Cetin I
Cesari E
Derks J
Ebbing C
Ferrazzi E
Ganzevoort W
Frusca T
Gordijn SJ
Gyselaers W
Hecher K
Klaritsch P
Krofta L
Lindgren P
Lobmaier SM
Marlow N
Maruotti GM
Mecacci F
Myklestad K
Napolitano R
Prefumo F
Raio L
Richter J
Sande RK
Thornton J
Valensise H
Visser GHA
Wee L
Source :
Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980) [Ultraschall Med] 2023 Feb; Vol. 44 (1), pp. 56-67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 12.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose:  To assess the longitudinal variation of the ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility index (UCR) in late preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR).<br />Materials and Methods:  A prospective European multicenter observational study included women with a singleton pregnancy, 32 <superscript>+ 0</superscript> -36 <superscript>+ 6</superscript> , at risk of FGR (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or abdominal circumference [AC] < 10 <superscript>th</superscript> percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler or fall in AC from 20-week scan of > 40 percentile points). The primary outcome was a composite of abnormal condition at birth or major neonatal morbidity. UCR was categorized as normal (< 0.9) or abnormal (≥ 0.9). UCR was assessed by gestational age at measurement interval to delivery, and by individual linear regression coefficient in women with two or more measurements.<br />Results:  856 women had 2770 measurements; 696 (81 %) had more than one measurement (median 3 (IQR 2-4). At inclusion, 63 (7 %) a UCR ≥ 0.9. These delivered earlier and had a lower birth weight and higher incidence of adverse outcome (30 % vs. 9 %, relative risk 3.2; 95 %CI 2.1-5.0) than women with a normal UCR at inclusion. Repeated measurements after an abnormal UCR at inclusion were abnormal again in 67 % (95 %CI 55-80), but after a normal UCR the chance of finding an abnormal UCR was 6 % (95 %CI 5-7 %). The risk of composite adverse outcome was similar using the first or subsequent UCR values.<br />Conclusion:  An abnormal UCR is likely to be abnormal again at a later measurement, while after a normal UCR the chance of an abnormal UCR is 5-7 % when repeated weekly. Repeated measurements do not predict outcome better than the first measurement, most likely due to the most compromised fetuses being delivered after an abnormal UCR.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1438-8782
Volume :
44
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34768305
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1511-8293