Back to Search Start Over

Factors Predicting Difficult Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones.

Authors :
Saito H
Kadono Y
Shono T
Kamikawa K
Urata A
Nasu J
Imamura H
Matsushita I
Kakuma T
Tada S
Source :
Clinical endoscopy [Clin Endosc] 2022 Mar; Vol. 55 (2), pp. 263-269. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 12.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background/aims: Difficult biliary cannulation is an important risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors that predict difficult cannulation for common bile duct stones (CBDS) to reduce the risk for PEP.<br />Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 1,406 consecutive patients with native papillae who underwent ERCP for CBDS. Factors predicting difficult cannulation for CBDS were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.<br />Results: Univariate analysis showed that six factors significantly predicted difficult cannulation: ERCP performed by non-expert endoscopists, low-volume center, absence of acute cholangitis, normal serum bilirubin, intradiverticular papilla, and type of major duodenal papilla. Multivariate analysis identified ERCP performed by non-expert endoscopists (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; p<0.001), low-volume center (OR, 1.6; p<0.001), intradiverticular papilla (OR, 1.3; p=0.007), normal serum bilirubin (OR, 1.3; p=0.038), and absence of acute cholangitis (OR, 1.3; p=0.049) as factors significantly predicting difficult cannulation for CBDS.<br />Conclusion: Initial cannulation by an experienced endoscopist, early rescue cannulation, or early takeover by an experienced endoscopist should be considered when performing ERCP for CBDS in the presence of factors predicting difficult cannulation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2234-2400
Volume :
55
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34763384
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.153