Back to Search Start Over

The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale.

Authors :
Mangano MC
Berlino M
Corbari L
Milisenda G
Lucchese M
Terzo S
Bosch-Belmar M
Azaza MS
Babarro JMF
Bakiu R
Broitman BR
Buschmann AH
Christofoletti R
Dong Y
Glamuzina B
Luthman O
Makridis P
Nogueira AJA
Palomo MG
Dineshram R
Sanchez-Jerez P
Sevgili H
Troell M
AbouelFadl KY
Azra MN
Britz P
Carrington E
Celić I
Choi F
Qin C
Dionísio MA
Dobroslavić T
Galli P
Giannetto D
Grabowski JH
Helmuth B
Lebata-Ramos MJH
Lim PT
Liu Y
Llorens SM
Mirto S
Pećarević M
Pita C
Ragg N
Ravagnan E
Saidi D
Schultz K
Shaltout M
Tan SH
Thiyagarajan V
Sarà G
Source :
Environmental science & policy [Environ Sci Policy] 2022 Jan; Vol. 127, pp. 98-110. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 27.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal ( i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1462-9011
Volume :
127
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Environmental science & policy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34720746
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014