Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes of male patients attending the symptomatic breast unit: adherence to local and national imaging guidelines and effectiveness of clinical examination and imaging in detecting male breast cancer.

Authors :
Healy NA
Parag Y
Wallis MG
Tanner J
Kilburn-Toppin F
Source :
Clinical radiology [Clin Radiol] 2022 Jan; Vol. 77 (1), pp. e64-e74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 27.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Aim: To review outcomes of male patients attending the breast unit, evaluate effectiveness of imaging and examination in detecting breast cancer and review adherence to guidelines for male breast imaging.<br />Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of male patients attending Cambridge Breast Unit from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Patient electronic records and imaging were reviewed to establish demographics, clinical findings, imaging, biopsy, and pathology outcomes.<br />Results: Of 1,362 male patients attending the breast unit, 1,028 (75%) had imaging performed. Biopsy was performed in 41 men (3%), with 14 cancers diagnosed (1%). Clinical examination showed 42.7% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 54.6% positive predictive value (PPV) and 99.4% negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of cancer. Mammogram demonstrated 84.6% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity, 69.8% PPV, and 99.8% NPV for detection of malignancy. Ultrasound demonstrated 78.6% sensitivity, 98.9% specificity, 73.3% PPV and 99.2% NPV for detection of cancer. Forty-one percent of patients <40 years and 51% < 50 years were imaged, who according to local and Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines did not require imaging based on age and clinical score.<br />Conclusion: Male patients account for a small proportion of referrals to the breast unit but generate significant workload. Imaging protocols, incorporating clinical score and age cut-off at 40 years remains robust for detecting malignancy. Clinician awareness of the imaging protocol, and close liaison with radiologists is essential to minimise additional radiology workload.<br /> (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-229X
Volume :
77
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34716007
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.018