Back to Search Start Over

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of the Brainstem Safe Entry Zones Based on Internal Structures.

Authors :
Serrato-Avila JL
Paz Archila JA
Silva da Costa MD
Riechelmann GS
Rocha PR
Marques SR
Carvalho de Moraes LO
Cavalheiro S
Yağmurlu K
Lawton MT
Chaddad-Neto F
Source :
World neurosurgery [World Neurosurg] 2022 Feb; Vol. 158, pp. e64-e74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 27.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: Brainstem safe entry zones (EZs) are gates to access the intrinsic pathology of the brainstem. We performed a quantitative analysis of the intrinsic surgical corridor limits of the most commonly used EZs and illustrated these through an inside perspective using 2-dimensional photographs, 3-dimensional photographs, and interactive 3-dimensional model reconstructions.<br />Methods: A total of 26 human brainstems (52 sides) with the cerebellum attached were prepared using the Klingler method and dissected. The safe working areas and distances for each EZ were defined according to the eloquent fiber tracts and nuclei.<br />Results: The largest safe distance corresponded to the depth for the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (4.8 mm), supratrigeminal (10 mm), epitrigeminal (13.2 mm), peritrigeminal (13.3 mm), lateral transpeduncular (22.3 mm), and infracollicular (4.6 mm); the rostrocaudal axis for the perioculomotor (11.7 mm), suprafacial (12.6 mm), and transolivary (12.8 mm); and the mediolateral axis for the supracollicular (9.1 mm) and infracollicular (7 mm) EZs. The safe working areas were 46.7 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the perioculomotor, 21.3 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the supracollicular, 14.8 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the infracollicular, 33.1 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the supratrigeminal, 34.3 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the suprafacial, 21.9 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the infrafacial, and 51.7 mm <superscript>2</superscript> for the transolivary EZs.<br />Conclusions: The largest safe distance in most EZs corresponded to the depth, followed by the rostrocaudal axis and, finally, the mediolateral axis. The transolivary had the largest safe working area of all EZs. The supracollicular EZ had the largest safe area to access the midbrain tectum and the suprafacial EZ for the floor of the fourth ventricle.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-8769
Volume :
158
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
World neurosurgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34715371
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.100