Back to Search Start Over

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.

Authors :
Nosek BA
Hardwicke TE
Moshontz H
Allard A
Corker KS
Dreber A
Fidler F
Hilgard J
Kline Struhl M
Nuijten MB
Rohrer JM
Romero F
Scheel AM
Scherer LD
Schönbrodt FD
Vazire S
Source :
Annual review of psychology [Annu Rev Psychol] 2022 Jan 04; Vol. 73, pp. 719-748. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 19.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Replication-an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice-is gaining appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability is important for making research progress. If findings are not replicable, then prediction and theory development are stifled. If findings are replicable, then interrogation of their meaning and validity can advance knowledge. Assessing replicability can be productive for generating and testing hypotheses by actively confronting current understandings to identify weaknesses and spur innovation. For psychology, the 2010s might be characterized as a decade of active confrontation. Systematic and multi-site replication projects assessed current understandings and observed surprising failures to replicate many published findings. Replication efforts highlighted sociocultural challenges such as disincentives to conduct replications and a tendency to frame replication as a personal attack rather than a healthy scientific practice, and they raised awareness that replication contributes to self-correction. Nevertheless, innovation in doing and understanding replication and its cousins, reproducibility and robustness, has positioned psychology to improve research practices and accelerate progress.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1545-2085
Volume :
73
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annual review of psychology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34665669
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157