Back to Search Start Over

Exploring microwave irradiation as a method to disinfect contact lens cases.

Authors :
Goble BJ
Boyd JD
Grady ME
Source :
Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association [Cont Lens Anterior Eye] 2022 Aug; Vol. 45 (4), pp. 101522. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 09.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: Biofilm formation caused by infrequent contact lens case replacement and the ineffectiveness of multi-purpose solutions (MPS) on biofilm removal is associated with high rates of bacterial keratitis infections. This study demonstrated biofilm elimination from the contact lens case by microwave irradiation.<br />Methods: Staphylococcus aureus biofilms indicative of 3-9 months of contact wear were cultured in contact lens cases and visualized with crystal violet (CV) staining. Biofilms in contact cases were then exposed to four treatment regimens: No treatment (n = 8), 45 s microwave irradiation (n = 8), tap water (n = 6), and MPS (n = 9). Bacterial survival was assessed by colony forming unit (CFU) assay using streak dilutions.<br />Results: Visualization of the biofilms through CV staining revealed that biofilms coalesce between ribs of the contact case. In 5/8 cases no CFU were cultivated from the case after treatment with microwave irradiation. In tap water and MPS the first dilution averaged 6 ± 2 and 31 ± 13 CFUs per plate, respectively, while microwave irradiation averaged < 1 CFU per plate. In Dilution 2, the average reduced to 0.7 ± 0.7 and 6 ± 5 CFUs per plate for tap water and MPS, respectively, while microwave irradiation had 0 CFUs in Dilution 2.<br />Conclusion: Biofilms that coalesce between the ribs of the contact case pose a threat because this area is difficult to thoroughly scrub and could act as a basis for infection through fouling of contact lenses. Of the four treatment regimens, microwave irradiation displayed the most consistent and highest rate of bacterial eradication. Tap water was less effective compared to microwave irradiation, and poses other harmful side effects, but greatly reduced CFU count compared to no treatment. MPS displayed the poorest bacterial eradication of the treatments. Thus, microwave irradiation is worth further investigation as a viable in-home disinfecting option.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5411
Volume :
45
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34642118
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2021.101522