Back to Search Start Over

In-vivo X-ray dark-field computed tomography for the detection of radiation-induced lung damage in mice.

Authors :
Burkhardt R
Gora T
Fingerle AA
Sauter AP
Meurer F
Gassert FT
Dobiasch S
Schilling D
Feuchtinger A
Walch AK
Multhoff G
Herzen J
Noël PB
Rummeny EJ
Combs SE
Schmid TE
Pfeiffer F
Wilkens JJ
Source :
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology [Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol] 2021 Sep 24; Vol. 20, pp. 11-16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 24 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Radiotherapy of thoracic tumours can lead to side effects in the lung, which may benefit from early diagnosis. We investigated the potential of X-ray dark-field computed tomography by a proof-of-principle murine study in a clinically relevant radiotherapeutic setting aiming at the detection of radiation-induced lung damage.<br />Material and Methods: Six mice were irradiated with 20 Gy to the entire right lung. Together with five unirradiated control mice, they were imaged using computed tomography with absorption and dark-field contrast before and 16 weeks post irradiation. Mean pixel values for the right and left lung were calculated for both contrasts, and the right-to-left-ratio R of these means was compared. Radiologists also assessed the tomograms acquired 16 weeks post irradiation. Sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intra-reader accuracy were evaluated.<br />Results: In absorption contrast the group-average of R showed no increase in the control group and increased by 7% (p = 0.005) in the irradiated group. In dark-field contrast, it increased by 2% in the control group and by 14% (p = 0.005) in the irradiated group. Specificity was 100% for both contrasts but sensitivity was almost four times higher using dark-field tomography. Two cases were missed by absorption tomography but were detected by dark-field tomography.<br />Conclusions: The applicability of X-ray dark-field computed tomography for the detection of radiation-induced lung damage was demonstrated in a pre-clinical mouse model. The presented results illustrate the differences between dark-field and absorption contrast and show that dark-field tomography could be advantageous in future clinical settings.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-6316
Volume :
20
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34611553
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.003