Back to Search Start Over

Inhaled Nitric Oxide via High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Related to COVID-19.

Authors :
Chandel A
Patolia S
Ahmad K
Aryal S
Brown AW
Sahjwani D
Khangoora V
Shlobin OA
Cameron PC
Singhal A
Holtzclaw AW
Desai M
Nathan SD
King CS
Source :
Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine [Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med] 2021 Sep 29; Vol. 15, pp. 11795484211047065. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 29 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Limited evidence exists regarding use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in spontaneously breathing patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of continuous iNO via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in COVID-19 respiratory failure.<br />Methods: We performed a multicenter cohort study of patients with respiratory failure from COVID-19 managed with HFNC. Patients were stratified by administration of iNO via HFNC. Regression analysis was used to compare the need for mechanical ventilation and secondary endpoints including hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, and need for extracorporeal life support.<br />Results: A total of 272 patients were identified and 66 (24.3%) of these patients received iNO via HFNC for a median of 88 h (interquartile range: 44, 135). After 12 h of iNO, supplemental oxygen requirement was unchanged or increased in 52.7% of patients. Twenty-nine (43.9%) patients treated with iNO compared to 79 (38.3%) patients without iNO therapy required endotracheal intubation ( P  = .47). After multivariable adjustment, there was no difference in need for mechanical ventilation between groups (odds ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-3.17), however, iNO administration was associated with longer hospital length of stay (incidence rate ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.31-1.51). No difference was found for mortality, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for extracorporeal life support.<br />Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, iNO delivered via HFNC did not reduce oxygen requirements in the majority of patients or improve clinical outcomes. Given the observed association with increased length of stay, judicious selection of those likely to benefit from this therapy is warranted.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1179-5484
Volume :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34602831
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/11795484211047065