Back to Search Start Over

Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study.

Authors :
Loehr A
Patnaik A
Campbell D
Shapiro J
Bryce AH
McDermott R
Sautois B
Vogelzang NJ
Bambury RM
Voog E
Zhang J
Piulats JM
Hussain A
Ryan CJ
Merseburger AS
Daugaard G
Heidenreich A
Fizazi K
Higano CS
Krieger LE
Sternberg CN
Watkins SP
Despain D
Simmons AD
Dowson M
Golsorkhi T
Chowdhury S
Abida W
Source :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research [Clin Cancer Res] 2021 Dec 15; Vol. 27 (24), pp. 6677-6686. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 01.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA <superscript>+</superscript> ), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report clinical efficacy in patients with BRCA <superscript>+</superscript> mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2.<br />Patients and Methods: Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor-directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized.<br />Results: TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA <superscript>+</superscript> identified by central plasma ( n = 34), central tissue ( n = 37), or local ( n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA <superscript>+</superscript> by tissue testing.<br />Conclusions: Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA <superscript>+</superscript> mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.<br /> (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-3265
Volume :
27
Issue :
24
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34598946
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2199