Assessment of immune biomarkers and establishing a triple negative phenotype in gynecologic cancers.

Objective: Immuno-oncology (IO) has rapidly evolved, with many IO therapies either approved or under investigation for multiple malignancies. Biomarkers exist that can predict response to IO therapies including PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and total mutation burden (TMB). This paper serves to analyze the presence of these biomarkers across gynecologic cancers.
Methods: A total of 16,300 gynecologic cancer specimens submitted for molecular profiling to Caris Life Sciences were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the SP142 anti-PD-L1 clone and assessed for intensity. Next-generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and fragment analysis were used to determine MSI status. TMB was measured by counting all non-synonymous missense mutations found per tumor not previously described as germline alterations. Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare cohorts.
Results: Of 16,300 specimens, 54.1% were ovarian, 37.2% uterine, 7.2% cervical, 0.3% vulvar, 1.2% vaginal, with 0.1% unspecified. MSI-H was most frequent in uterine cancer (17.7%) and only 1% of ovarian cancers. PD-L1 expression was present in 38.3% of cervical and 62.5% of vulvar cancers, but less than 8% of ovarian and uterine cancers. TMB-H was present in 21.1% cervical, 19.7% uterine, and 5% ovarian cancers. Few specimens exhibited a "triple positive" phenotype - 0.3% ovarian, 1.5% uterine, and 1.5% cervical. Associations were seen between MSI, TMB, and PD-L1 across all cancer types.
Conclusions: The frequency of individual biomarkers pertinent to IO therapy varies by cancer type. HPV-driven genital tract cancers have higher frequencies of PD-L1 expression, MSI-H, and TMBH. Endometrial cancers are characterized by MSI-H and TMB, whereas ovarian cancers have a low frequency of MSI-H and modest PD-L1 or TMBH. The incidence of 'triple positive" cases was less than 2%.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest W.M. Korn is both an employee and stockholder of Caris Life Sciences and acts as a consultant for Merck. T. Herzog receives consulting fees from AZ, Caris, Clovis, Eisai, Genentech, GSK, J&J, and Merck; additionally, he participates on the Corcept data safety monitoring board and acts as treasurer for the GOG foundation. N. Jones receives consulting fees from Seagan. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)