Back to Search Start Over

Ayurvedic vs. Conventional Nutritional Therapy Including Low-FODMAP Diet for Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Jeitler M
Wottke T
Schumann D
Puerto Valencia LM
Michalsen A
Steckhan N
Mittwede M
Stapelfeldt E
Koppold-Liebscher D
Cramer H
Wischnewsky M
Murthy V
Kessler CS
Source :
Frontiers in medicine [Front Med (Lausanne)] 2021 Sep 06; Vol. 8, pp. 622029. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 06 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims: To compare the effects of Ayurvedic and conventional nutritional therapy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods: Sixty-nine patients with IBS were randomized to Ayurvedic ( n = 35) or conventional nutritional therapy according to the recommendations of the German Nutrition Society including the low-FODMAP diet ( n = 34). Study visits took place at baseline and after 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome was IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) after 3 months; secondary outcomes included stress (CPSS), anxiety and depression (HADS), well-being (WHO-5) and IBS-specific quality of life (IBS-QOL). A repeated measures general linear model (GLM) for intent-to-treat-analyses was applied in this explorative study. Results: After 3 months, estimated marginal means for IBS-SSS reductions were 123.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 92.8-154.9; p < 0.001] in the Ayurvedic and 72.7 (95% CI = 38.8-106.7; p < 0.001) in the conventional group. The IBS-SSS reduction was significantly higher in the Ayurveda group compared to the conventional therapy group (estimated marginal mean = 51.1; 95% CI = 3.8-98.5; p = 0.035) and clinically meaningful. Sixty-eight percentage of the variance in IBS-SSS reduction after 3 months can be explained by treatment, 6.5% by patients' expectations for their therapies and 23.4% by IBS-SSS at pre-intervention. Both therapies are equivalent in their contribution to the outcome variance. The higher the IBS-SSS score at pre-intervention and the larger the patients' expectations, the greater the IBS-SSS reduction. There were no significant group differences in any secondary outcome measures. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Conclusion: Patients with IBS seem to benefit significantly from Ayurvedic or conventional nutritional therapy. The results warrant further studies with longer-term follow-ups and larger sample sizes. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03019861, identifier: NCT03019861.<br />Competing Interests: CK and ES participate in training courses on Ayurveda at the European Academy for Ayurveda, Birstein and at Sonne und Mond, Berlin. MM participates in training courses on Ayurveda at the European Academy of Ayurveda, Birstein. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Jeitler, Wottke, Schumann, Puerto Valencia, Michalsen, Steckhan, Mittwede, Stapelfeldt, Koppold-Liebscher, Cramer, Wischnewsky, Murthy and Kessler.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2296-858X
Volume :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34552937
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.622029