Back to Search Start Over

What does evidence tell us about the use of gait robotic devices in patients with multiple sclerosis? A comprehensive systematic review on functional outcomes and clinical recommendations.

Authors :
Calabrò RS
Cassio A
Mazzoli D
Andrenelli E
Bizzarini E
Campanini I
Carmignano SM
Cerulli S
Chisari C
Colombo V
Dalise S
Fundarò C
Gazzotti V
Mazzoleni D
Mazzucchelli M
Melegari C
Merlo A
Stampacchia G
Boldrini P
Mazzoleni S
Posteraro F
Benanti P
Castelli E
Draicchio F
Falabella V
Galeri S
Gimigliano F
Grigioni M
Mazzon S
Molteni F
Petrarca M
Picelli A
Senatore M
Turchetti G
Morone G
Bonaiuti D
Source :
European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine [Eur J Phys Rehabil Med] 2021 Oct; Vol. 57 (5), pp. 841-849. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 22.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing evidence on the efficacy of gait robotic rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but most of the studies have focused on gait parameters. Moreover, clear indications on the clinical use of robotics still lack. As part of the CICERONE Italian Consensus on Robotic Rehabilitation, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the existing evidence concerning the role of lower limb robotic rehabilitation in improving functional recovery in patients with MS.<br />Evidence Acquisition: We searched for and systematically reviewed evidence-based studies on gait robotic rehabilitation in MS, between January 1 <superscript>st</superscript> , 2010 and December 31 <superscript>st</superscript> , 2020, in the following databases: Cochrane Library, PEDro, PubMed and Google Scholar. The study quality was assessed by the 16-item assessment of multiple systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and the 10-item PEDro scale for the other research studies.<br />Evidence Synthesis: After an accurate screening, only 17 papers were included in the review, and most of them (13 RCT) had a level II evidence. Most of the studies used the Lokomat as a grounded robotic device, two investigated the efficacy of end-effectors and two powered exoskeletons. Generally speaking, robotic treatment has beneficial effects on gait speed, endurance and balance with comparable outcomes to those of conventional treatments. However, in more severe patients (EDSS >6), robotics leads to better functional outcomes. Notably, after gait training with robotics (especially when coupled to virtual reality) MS patients also reach better non-motor outcomes, including spasticity, fatigue, pain, psychological well-being and quality of life. Unfortunately, no clinical indications emerge on the treatment protocols.<br />Conclusions: The present comprehensive systematic review highlights the potential beneficial role on functional outcomes of the lower limb robotic devices in people with MS. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the role of robotics not only for walking and balance outcomes, but also for other gait-training-related benefits, to identify appropriate outcome measures related to a specific subgroup of MS subjects' disease severity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1973-9095
Volume :
57
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34547886
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06915-X