Back to Search Start Over

Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan.

Authors :
Habu Y
Hamasaki R
Maruo M
Nakagawa T
Aono Y
Hachimine D
Source :
Journal of general and family medicine [J Gen Fam Med] 2021 Feb 21; Vol. 22 (5), pp. 237-245. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 21 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstays of treatment. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of PPIs. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), vonoprazan (VPZ), was recently introduced, which may provide clinical benefits. This study was performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of alternative long-term strategies including continuous and discontinuous treatment with VPZ for the management of reflux esophagitis in Japan.<br />Methods: A health state transition model was developed to capture the long-term management of reflux esophagitis. Four different strategies were compared: (a) intermittent PPI using lansoprazole (LPZ); (b) intermittent P-CAB; (c) maintenance PPI using LPZ; and (d) maintenance P-CAB.<br />Results: Intermittent P-CAB was the most cost-effective, and the number of days for which medication was required with this strategy was fewest. Maintenance PPI was more efficacious, but more costly than intermittent P-CAB. Maintenance P-CAB was more efficacious, but more costly than maintenance PPI. Co-payments were higher for maintenance PPI than for intermittent P-CAB, and for maintenance P-CAB than for maintenance PPI, which were considered reasonable for the majority of patients to improve symptoms.<br />Conclusions: Intermittent P-CAB appears to be the strategy of choice for the majority of reflux esophagitis patients in clinical practice. If a patient is not satisfied with the symptom control of the current strategy, switching to a more effective strategy appears to be a reasonable option for the majority of patients.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.<br /> (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of General and Family Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Primary Care Association.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2189-7948
Volume :
22
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of general and family medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34484992
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.429