Back to Search Start Over

Intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography for diagnosis of left atrial appendage thrombosis in atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

Authors :
He G
Liu H
Huang X
Deng X
Yang G
Luo D
Cai L
Source :
Clinical cardiology [Clin Cardiol] 2021 Oct; Vol. 44 (10), pp. 1416-1421. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 03.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation is usually detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can be a suitable alternative to detect thrombosis. However, the effectiveness of the two methods for detecting LAA thrombus is still unclear, we performed a meta-analysis that compared ICE versus TEE for LAA thrombosis.<br />Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase for published abstracts and manuscripts on June 1, 2020. The analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3, STATA 15, and Meta-Disc 1.4.<br />Results: Eight studies consists of 1108 patients (TEE = 558 vs. ICE = 550) were included. The average sensitivity of ICE and TEE to diagnose LAA thrombus is 1.0 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00) versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49-0.83), and specificity of ICE and TEE to diagnosis of LAA thrombus is 1.0 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00) versus 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99). The AUC of ICE and TEE is 0.9846 (SEAUC = 0.0196) and 0.9655 (SEAUC = 0.0401), and the Q* statistics is 0.9462 (SEQ* = 0.0406) and 0.9127 (SEQ * = 0.0616), respectively. Z test was performed on Q* statistics (Z = 0.45, pā€‰>ā€‰.05).<br />Conclusion: The ICE and TEE have similar diagnostic efficacy for LAA thrombosis, but the ICE has higher sensitivity. Compared with TEE, ICE may be more advantages and prospects for clinical application.<br /> (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-8737
Volume :
44
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34480383
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23698