Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of a patient decision aid for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing an ovarian cancer prevention strategy.

Authors :
Steenbeek MP
van Bommel MHD
Harmsen MG
Hoogerbrugge N
van Doorn HC
Keurentjes JHM
van Beurden M
Zweemer RP
Gaarenstroom KN
Penders CGJ
Brood-van Zanten MMA
Vos MC
Piek JM
van Lonkhuijzen LRCW
Apperloo MJA
Coppus SFPJ
IntHout J
de Hullu JA
Hermens RPMG
Source :
Gynecologic oncology [Gynecol Oncol] 2021 Nov; Vol. 163 (2), pp. 371-377. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 27.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: Risk-reducing surgery is advised to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers around the age of 40 years to reduce ovarian cancer risk. In the TUBA-study, a multicenter preference study (NCT02321228), BRCA1/2-PV carriers are offered a choice: the standard strategy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or the novel strategy of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy. We evaluated feasibility and effectiveness of a patient decision aid for this choice.<br />Methods: Premenopausal BRCA1/2-PV carriers were counselled for risk-reducing surgical options in the TUBA-study; the first cohort was counselled without and the second cohort with decision aid. Evaluation was performed using digital questionnaires for participating women and their healthcare professionals. Outcome measures included actual choice, feasibility (usage and experiences) and effectiveness (knowledge, cancer worry, decisional conflict, decisional regret and self-estimated influence on decision).<br />Results: 283 women were counselled without and 282 women with decision aid. The novel strategy was chosen less frequently in women without compared with women with decision aid (67% vs 78%, p = 0.004). The decision aid was graded with an 8 out of 10 by both women and professionals, and 78% of the women would recommend this decision aid to others. Users of the decision aid reported increased knowledge about the options and increased insight in personal values. Knowledge on cancer risk, decisional conflict, decisional regret and cancer worry were similar in both cohorts.<br />Conclusions: The use of the patient decision aid for risk-reducing surgery is feasible, effective and highly appreciated among BRCA1/2-PV carriers facing the decision between salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1095-6859
Volume :
163
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gynecologic oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34456057
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.019