Back to Search Start Over

Sporadic Primary Pheochromocytoma: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Six Imaging Tests (CT, MRI, and PET/CT Using 68 Ga-DOTATATE, FDG, 18 F-FDOPA, and 18 F-FDA).

Authors :
Jha A
Patel M
Carrasquillo JA
Ling A
Millo C
Saboury B
Chen CC
Wakim P
Gonzales MK
Meuter L
Knue M
Talvacchio S
Herscovitch P
Rivero JD
Chen AP
Nilubol N
Taïeb D
Lin FI
Civelek AC
Pacak K
Source :
AJR. American journal of roentgenology [AJR Am J Roentgenol] 2022 Feb; Vol. 218 (2), pp. 342-350. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 25.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND . Recent professional society guidelines for radionuclide imaging of sporadic pheochromocytoma (PHEO) recommend <superscript>18</superscript> F-fluorodihydroxyphenylala-nine ( <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA) as the radiotracer of choice, deeming <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE and FDG to be second- and third-line agents, respectively. An additional agent, <superscript>18</superscript> F-fluorodopamine ( <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDA), remains experimental for PHEO detection. A paucity of research has performed head-to-head comparison among these agents. OBJECTIVE . The purpose of this study was to perform an intraindividual comparison of <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, FDG PET/CT, <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA PET/CT, <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDA PET/CT, CT, and MRI in visualization of sporadic primary PHEO. METHODS . This prospective study enrolled patients referred with clinical suspicion for sporadic PHEO. Patients were scheduled for <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, FDG PET/CT, <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA PET/CT, <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDA PET/CT, whole-body staging CT (portal venous phase), and MRI within a 3-month period. PET/CT examinations were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians, and CT and MRI were reviewed by two radiologists; differences were resolved by consensus. Readers scored lesions in terms of confidence in diagnosis of PHEO (1-5 scale; 4-5 considered positive for PHEO). Lesion-to-liver SUV <subscript>max</subscript> was computed using both readers' measurements. Interreader agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for SUV <subscript>max</subscript> . Analysis included only patients with histologically confirmed PHEO on resection. RESULTS . The analysis included 14 patients (eight women, six men; mean age, 52.4 ± 16.8 [SD] years) with PHEO. Both <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and FDG PET/CT were completed in all 14 patients, <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA PET/CT in 11, <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDA PET/CT in 7, CT in 12, and MRI in 12. Mean conspicuity score for PHEO was 5.0 ± 0.0 for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA PET/CT, 4.7 ± 0.5 for MRI, 4.6 ± 0.8 for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDA PET/CT, 4.4 ± 1.0 for <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 4.3 ± 1.0 for CT, and 4.1 ± 1.5 for FDG PET/CT. The positivity rate for PHEO was 100.0% (11/11) for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA PET/CT, 100.0% (12/12) for MRI, 85.7% (6/7) for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDA PET/CT, 78.6% (11/14) for FDG PET/CT, 78.6% (11/14) for <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, and 66.7% (8/12) for CT. Lesion-to-liver SUV <subscript>max</subscript> was 10.5 for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA versus 3.0-4.2 for the other tracers. Interreader agreement across modalities ranged from 85.7% to 100.0% for lesion positivity with ICCs of 0.55-1.00 for SUV <subscript>max</subscript> measurements. CONCLUSION . Findings from this small intraindividual comparative study support <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDOPA PET/CT as a preferred first-line imaging modality in evaluation of sporadic PHEO. CLINICAL IMPACT . This study provides data supporting current guidelines for imaging evaluation of suspected PHEO. TRIAL REGISTRATION . ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00004847.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1546-3141
Volume :
218
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34431366
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26071