Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of functional parameters, patient-reported outcomes and workload related to continuous urinary bladder irrigation after transurethral surgery.

Authors :
Reichelt AC
Dressler FF
Gratzke C
Miernik A
Schoeb DS
Source :
Translational andrology and urology [Transl Androl Urol] 2021 Jul; Vol. 10 (7), pp. 2921-2928.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Continuous saline bladder irrigation (CBI) is a common procedure after transurethral surgery and to treat gross hematuria. We conducted this study to gather data on parameters of CBI, medical staff's work load associated with CBI monitoring, patients' feeling of safety and of patients' impairments during CBI.<br />Methods: We observed CBI taking place after transurethral surgery for a 2-9-hour period. Patients were asked to rank how safe they felt, general impairments and impaired mobility. Irrigation parameters and complications were documented at least every 30 minutes. The staff's workload was evaluated through the frequency of visits and presence time.<br />Results: The patients' mobility was notably reduced with an average of 10.5%±16.7% of time spent outside of bed, pain was low (mean 0.60±1.15). Patients felt very safe with CBI (8.8±1.9), hardly impaired overall (3.8±3.0), but restricted in mobility (5.9±2.8). Pain was associated with general impairment and impaired mobility. Clot retention occurred in 5 patients. Average irrigation speed was 9.46±8.69 mL/min (0 to 86.7 mL/min). Urine bags were emptied on average every 2.2±1.2 hours. Patients were visited by medical personnel 1 to 11 times.<br />Conclusions: CBI remains an improvable procedure in terms of the irrigation process itself to prevent complications, the patients' feeling of safety and comfort during CBI and the amount of work associated with its monitoring. We have provided parameters for the implementation of more individualized CBI monitoring.<br />Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Registry; DRKS00023707; Registered retrospectively November 25 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023707.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-165). Anja Reichelt and Dominik S. Schoeb: Funding by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Arkadiusz Miernik: research funding: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), DE, coverage of travel expenses: German Association of Urology (DGU), DE, European Association of Urology (EAU), NL; advisor: KLS Martin GmbH, DE, Dornier MedTech Europe GmbH, RichardWolf GmbH, DE, KarlStorz SE & Co. KG, DE, Lisa laser OHG, DE, Boston Scientific, USA, Dornier MedTech Europe GmbH, DE, Medi-Tate Ltd., IL; reviewer: Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, A; royalties: Walter de Gruyter, DE, Springer Science+Business Media, DE. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2223-4691
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Translational andrology and urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34430394
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-165