Back to Search
Start Over
High-Dose Nitric Oxide From Pressurized Cylinders and Nitric Oxide Produced by an Electric Generator From Air.
- Source :
-
Respiratory care [Respir Care] 2022 Feb; Vol. 67 (2), pp. 201-208. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 19. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Background: High-dose (≥ 80 ppm) inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has antimicrobial effects. We designed a trial to test the preventive effects of high-dose NO on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in health care providers working with patients with COVID-19. The study was interrupted prematurely due to the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines for health care professionals. We thereby present data on safety and feasibility of breathing 160 ppm NO using 2 different NO sources, namely pressurized nitrogen/NO cylinders (INO) and electric NO (eNO) generators.<br />Methods: NO gas was inhaled at 160 ppm in air for 15 min twice daily, before and after each work shift, over 14 d by health care providers (NCT04312243). During NO administration, vital signs were continuously monitored. Safety was assessed by measuring transcutaneous methemoglobinemia (SpMet) and the inhaled nitrogen dioxide (NO <subscript>2</subscript> ) concentration.<br />Results: Twelve healthy health care professionals received a collective total of 185 administrations of high-dose NO (160 ppm) for 15 min twice daily. One-hundred and seventy-one doses were delivered by INO and 14 doses by eNO. During NO administration, SpMet increased similarly in both groups ( P = .82). Methemoglobin decreased in all subjects at 5 min after discontinuing NO administration. Inhaled NO <subscript>2</subscript> concentrations remained between 0.70 ppm (0.63-0.79) and 0.75 ppm (0.67-0.83) in the INO group and between 0.74 ppm (0.68-0.78) and 0.88 ppm (0.70-0.93) in the eNO group. During NO administration, peripheral oxygen saturation and heart rate did not change. No adverse events occurred.<br />Conclusions: This pilot study testing high-dose INO (160 ppm) for 15 min twice daily using eNO seems feasible and similarly safe when compared with INO.<br />Competing Interests: Drs Zapol and Yu disclose a relationship with Third Pole. Dr Carroll discloses a relationship with UNITAID. Dr Berra discloses relationships with iNO Therapeutics, Praxair, Masimo, the National Institutes of Health, and Fast Grant. The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 by Daedalus Enterprises.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1943-3654
- Volume :
- 67
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Respiratory care
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34413210
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09308