Back to Search
Start Over
Patch Test Reactions Associated With Topical Medications: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data (2001-2018).
- Source :
-
Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug [Dermatitis] 2022 Mar-Apr 01; Vol. 33 (2), pp. 144-154. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Background/objectives: Topical medications may lead to allergic contact dermatitis. This study characterized positive patch test reactions associated with medications in patients evaluated by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG).<br />Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of the NACDG data (2001-2018). Patients with at least 1 positive patch test reaction associated with a medication source were included. Allergens, reaction characteristics, clinical relevance, and source details were tabulated.<br />Results: Of 43,722 patients, 6374 (14.6%) had positive allergic patch test reactions associated with 1 or more topical medication sources. Patients with versus without allergic reactions to medications were more likely to be older than 40 years (P < 0.0001) and/or have primary sites of dermatitis on the legs, anal/genital region, or trunk (P < 0.0001). There were 8787 reactions to NACDG allergens; the most common were neomycin (29.4%), bacitracin (29.1%), propylene glycol 100% (10.6%), tixocortol-17-pivalate (10.0%), lidocaine (7.9%), budesonide (4.9%), and dibucaine (4.4%). Propylene glycol 100% was the most common inactive ingredient (10.6%). Current relevance was present in 61.0%. A total of 6.5% of the individuals with medication allergy would have had 1 or more positive patch test reactions missed if only tested to the NACDG screening series.<br />Conclusions: Positive patch test reactions associated with topical medications were common (14.6%), and most were clinically relevant. Patients with topical medication allergy were twice as likely to have anal/genital involvement. Active ingredients, especially neomycin, bacitracin, and tixocortol-17-pivalate, were frequent culprits.<br />Competing Interests: A.R.A. received a Pfizer Independent Grant for Learning & Change and has consulted for Henkel. J.S.T. owns noncontrolling common shares of stock in AstraZeneca, Cigna, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and Opko Health. He has consulted for Kao Brands and Monsanto (Bayer), is a member of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Steering Committee, and has a nondependent child employed by Pfizer. E.M.W. has received an investigator-initiated grant from and served as a consultant for Wen by Chaz Dean. She has also served as a consultant to Noven Pharmaceuticals. D.S. receives royalties from UpToDate (Wolters Kluwer Health). The other authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2162-5220
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34405832
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000777