Back to Search Start Over

Safety and feasibility of conduction system pacing in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors :
Cano Ó
Dandamudi G
Schaller RD
Pérez-Roselló V
Ayala HD
Izquierdo M
Osca J
Sancho-Tello MJ
Rueda J
Ruiz E
Insa B
Martínez-Dolz L
Vijayaraman P
Source :
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology [J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol] 2021 Oct; Vol. 32 (10), pp. 2692-2703. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 26.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an ideal physiologic pacing strategy for patients with permanent pacing indications. We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of CSP in a consecutive series of unselected patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).<br />Methods: Consecutive patients with CHD in which CSP was attempted were included. Safety and feasibility, implant tools and electrical parameters at implant and at follow-up were evaluated.<br />Results: A total of 20 patients were included (10 with a previous device). A total of 10 patients had complex forms of CHD, 9 moderate defects and 1 a simple defect. CSP was achieved in 75% of cases (10 His bundle pacing, 5 left bundle branch pacing) with left ventricular septal pacing in the remaining 5 patients. Procedure times and fluoroscopy times were prolongued (126 ± 82 min and 27 ± 30 min, respectively). Ventricular lead implant times widely varied ranging from 4 to 115 min, (mean 31 ± 28 min) and the use of multiple delivery sheaths was frequent (50%). The QRS width was reduced from 145 ± 36 ms at baseline to 116 ± 18 ms with CSP. Implant electrical parameters included: CSP pacing threshold 0.95 ± 0.65 V; R wave amplitude 9.2 ± 8.8 mV and pacing impedance 632 ± 183 Ohms, and remained stable at a median follow-up of 478 days (interquartile range: 225-567). Systemic ventricle systolic function and NYHA class (1.50 ± 0.51 vs. 1.10 ± 0.31; p = .008) significantly improved at follow-up. Lead revision was required in one patient at Day 4.<br />Conclusions: Permanent CSP is safe and feasible in patients with CHD although implant technique is complex.<br /> (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1540-8167
Volume :
32
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34405485
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15213