An Updated Comparison of Conventional Coronary Angiography With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose the Origin and Proximal Course of Anomalous Coronary Arteries.

MLA

Al-Mubarak, Muhannad, et al. “An Updated Comparison of Conventional Coronary Angiography With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose the Origin and Proximal Course of Anomalous Coronary Arteries.” The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 9, Sept. 2021, pp. E687–93. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/20.00585.

APA

Al-Mubarak, M., Prejean, S. P., Gupta, H., Singh, S. P., Evanochko, W. T., Redden, D., Nath, H., & Lloyd, S. G. (2021). An Updated Comparison of Conventional Coronary Angiography With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose the Origin and Proximal Course of Anomalous Coronary Arteries. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 33(9), E687–E693. https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/20.00585

Chicago

Al-Mubarak, Muhannad, Shane P Prejean, Himanshu Gupta, Satinder P Singh, William T Evanochko, David Redden, Hrudaya Nath, and Steven G Lloyd. 2021. “An Updated Comparison of Conventional Coronary Angiography With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose the Origin and Proximal Course of Anomalous Coronary Arteries.” The Journal of Invasive Cardiology 33 (9): E687–93. doi:10.25270/jic/20.00585.