Back to Search Start Over

The potential impact of acute coronary syndromes on automatic sensing system in Subcutaneous-ICDs.

Authors :
Narducci ML
Scacciavillani R
Pinnacchio G
Bencardino G
Perna F
Comerci G
Campisi M
Ceccarelli I
Pavone C
Spera F
Bisignani A
Crea F
Pelargonio G
Source :
International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature [Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc] 2021 Jul 20; Vol. 35, pp. 100841. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 20 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The Subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) is emerging as a suitable option for most ICD candidates, however some open issues regarding the sensing algorithm still remain.<br />Objectives: We aimed to examine the performance of the S-ICD sensing algorithm in patients hospitalized for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), before and after revascularization.<br />Methods: We performed a S-ICD automated screening on 75 patients, 21 hospitalized for STEMI, 23 for NSTE-ACS and 31 for CCS, before and after percutaneous revascularization, regardless their eligibility to ICD implantation.<br />Results: Patients did not differ in clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. Rates of screening pass were significantly lower in STEMI patients compared to NSTE-ACS and CCS (5% vs 56.7% vs 81% respectively, p < .0001). The viability of the primary vector was lower in STEMI patients compared to NSTE-ACS and CCS (33% vs 56% vs 71%, p .027 respectively). After revascularization, there were no more significant differences between groups. Pairing subjects at baseline and after revascularization, STEMI subjects percentages of screening success were respectively 5% and 81% (p < .001) and the rates of primary vector viability were 33% and 81% (p .002). STEMI was the only independent predictor of screening failure at multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 10.68 confidence interval 2.77-41.38, p = .001).<br />Conclusion: The performance of the S-ICD and possible malfunction detections in the context of an acute ischemic event deserve further evaluation. Adequate patient selection and the development of dynamic device programming are warranted.<br />Competing Interests: The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.<br /> (© 2021 The Authors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2352-9067
Volume :
35
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34345651
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100841