Back to Search Start Over

Regional Anaesthesia for Lower Extremity Amputation is Associated with Reduced Post-operative Complications Compared with General Anaesthesia.

Authors :
Mufarrih SH
Qureshi NQ
Schaefer MS
Sharkey A
Fatima H
Chaudhary O
Krumm S
Baribeau V
Mahmood F
Schermerhorn M
Matyal R
Source :
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery [Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg] 2021 Sep; Vol. 62 (3), pp. 476-484. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 22.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: Primary and secondary lower extremity amputation, performed for patients with lower extremity arterial disease, is associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of regional anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on post-operative pulmonary complications.<br />Methods: A retrospective analysis of 45 492 patients undergoing lower extremity amputation between 2005 and 2018 was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Safety Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to assess differences in primary outcome of post-operative pulmonary complications (pneumonia or respiratory failure requiring re-intubation) within 48 hours and 30 days after surgery between patients receiving regional (RA) or general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes included post-operative blood transfusion, septic shock, re-operation, and post-operative death within 30 days.<br />Results: Of 45 492 patients, 40 026 (88.0%) received GA and 5 466 (12.0%) RA. Patients who received GA had higher odds of developing pulmonary complications at 48 hours (2.1% vs. 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 1.78; p = .007) and within 30 days (6.3% vs. 5.9%; aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.78; p = .039). The odds of blood transfusions (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21; p = .017), septic shock (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.60; p = .025) and re-operation (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.53; p = .023) were also higher for patients who received GA vs. patients who received RA. No difference in mortality rate was observed between patients who received GA and those who received RA (5.7% vs. 7.1%; odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.07).<br />Conclusion: A statistically significant reduction in pulmonary complications was observed in patients who received RA for lower extremity amputation compared with GA.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2165
Volume :
62
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34303598
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.040