Back to Search Start Over

Mitigation of global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in arable soil with green manure as source of nitrogen.

Authors :
Lee HH
Kim SU
Han HR
Hur DY
Owens VN
Kumar S
Hong CO
Source :
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) [Environ Pollut] 2021 Nov 01; Vol. 288, pp. 117724. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 06.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of different green manure treatments on net GWP and GHGI in upland soil. Barley (B), hairy vetch (HV), and a barley/hairy vetch mixture (BHV) were sown on an upland soil on November 4, 2017 and October 24, 2018. The aboveground biomass of these green manures was incorporated into soil on June 1, 2018 and May 8, 2019. In addition, a fallow treatment (F) was installed as the control. Maize was transplanted as the subsequent crop after incorporation of green manures. Green manuring significantly affected CO <subscript>2</subscript> and N <subscript>2</subscript> O emission, but not CH <subscript>4</subscript> . Average cumulative soil respiration across years with HV and BHV were 37.0 Mg CO <subscript>2</subscript> ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> and 35.8 Mg CO <subscript>2</subscript> ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , respectively and significantly higher than those with under F and B (32.7 Mg CO <subscript>2</subscript> ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> and 33.0 Mg CO <subscript>2</subscript> ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , respectively). Cumulative N <subscript>2</subscript> O emissions across years with F and HV were 6.29 kg N <subscript>2</subscript> O ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> and 5.44 kg N <subscript>2</subscript> O ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , respectively and significantly higher than those with B and BHV (4.26 kg N <subscript>2</subscript> O ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> and 4.42 kg N <subscript>2</subscript> O ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , respectively). The net ecosystem carbon budget for HV (-0.5 Mg C ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> ) was the greatest among the treatments (F; -1.61 Mg C ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , B; -3.98 Mg C ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , and BHV; -0.91 Mg C ha <superscript>-1</superscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> ) because of its high biomass yields and the yield of maize after incorporation of HV. There was no significant difference of GHGI among F, HV, and BHV. Incorporation of HV or BHV could reduce net CO <subscript>2</subscript> emissions per unit of maize grain production as well as F.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-6424
Volume :
288
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34256287
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117724