Back to Search Start Over

Optimizing Diagnostic and Staging Pathways for Suspected Lung Cancer: A Decision Analysis.

Authors :
Vakil E
Jackson N
Sainz-Zuñega PV
Molina S
Martinez-Zayas G
Cantor SB
Grosu HB
Casal RF
Ost DE
Source :
Chest [Chest] 2021 Dec; Vol. 160 (6), pp. 2304-2323. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 10.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The optimal diagnostic and staging strategy for patients with suspected lung cancer is not known.<br />Research Question: What diagnostic and staging strategies are most cost-effective for lung cancer?<br />Study Design and Methods: A decision model was developed by using a hypothetical patient with a high probability of lung cancer. Sixteen unique permutations of bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy, radial endobronchial ultrasound, electromagnetic navigation, convex endobronchial ultrasound with or without rapid-onsite evaluation (ROSE), CT-guided biopsy (CTBx), and surgery were evaluated. Outcomes included cost, complications, mortality, time to complete the evaluation, rate of undetected N2-3 disease at surgery, incremental cost-complication ratio, and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Sensitivity analyses were performed on primary outcomes.<br />Results: For a peripheral lung lesion and radiographic N0 disease, the best bronchoscopy strategy costs $1,694 more than the best CTBx strategy but resulted in fewer complications (risk difference, 14%). The additional cost of bronchoscopy to avoid one complication from a CTBx strategy was $12,037. The cost and cumulative complications of bronchoscopy strategies increased compared with CTBx strategies for small lesions. The cost and cumulative complications of bronchoscopy strategies decreased compared with CTBx strategies when a bronchus sign was present, but bronchoscopy remained more costly overall. For a central lesion and/or radiographic N1-3 disease, convex endobronchial ultrasound with ROSE followed by lung biopsy with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, if required, was more cost-effective than any CTBx strategy across all outcomes. Strategies with ROSE were always more cost-effective than those without, irrespective of scenario. Trade-offs also exist between different bronchoscopy strategies, and optimal choices depend on the value placed on individual outcomes and willingness-to-pay.<br />Interpretation: The most cost-effective strategies depend on nodal stage, lesion location, type of peripheral bronchoscopic biopsy, and the use of ROSE. For most clinical scenarios, many strategies can be eliminated, and trade-offs between the remaining competitive strategies can be quantified.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1931-3543
Volume :
160
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Chest
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34256049
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.065